期刊文献+

论穆斯林联盟的不干涉土邦政策 被引量:1

On the Non-interference Policy of Muslim League in the Princely States
原文传递
导出
摘要 印巴分治实际上包含两方面的领土划分:一是英属印度的分割,二是众多土邦的归属。无论《蒙巴顿宣言》,还是《印度独立法》都只对前者做出明确规定,而对后者却语焉不详、甚至有意回避。国大党和穆斯林联盟都希望把更多的领土划归各自的自治领。英属印度领土是英国殖民者按照宗教原则进行分割的,故两个自治领若想争取更多的领土,就只能在土邦的归属上展开争夺。对于土邦的归属问题,学者们多从国大党和英国殖民者的角度进行分析,而作为这一过程主要参与者之一的穆盟作用却没有得到应有的重视。本文主要研究穆盟的不干涉土邦政策及对土邦归属的影响,从而深化对土邦归属原因的认知和理解。 The partition of Indian and Pakistan was associated with two territorial settlements:the division of the British India and the accession of the erstwhile princely states to either India or Pakistan.But the "Indian Independence Act" has presented clear provisions for the former only and the vague provisions for the latter.Indian National Congress and Muslim League all expected more territory to their dominions.The British India is divided according to the principle of religion.Therefore if the two parties expected more territories,they must compete for the Princely States.Many scholars have analyzed the issue from the perspective of Indian National Congress and British colonists.However the Muslim League,as the one of the primary participants in the process,has not received adequate attention that they deserved.This paper studies the policy of ML and its influence,which deepened our cognition of the belonging of Princely States.
作者 金兴礼
出处 《世界民族》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期11-17,共7页 Journal of World Peoples Studies
基金 山西大学人文社会科学科研基金(项目编号:0709055)的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Note by Mountbatten, 1 Nov. 1947, India Office: Political and Secret Department Records 1756 - 1950 (hereafter 10 L/P&S) /13/ 1845B.
  • 2High Commissioner Pakistan to Commonwealth Relations Office London, (tel.), 30 Oct. 1947, I0 L/P&S/13/1845B.
  • 3Viceroy' s personal report no. 16, 8 Aug. 1947, Mountbatten Papers, file 213.
  • 4V. P. Menon, The Integration oflndian States, p. 121.
  • 5Viceroy' s interview no. 169, 19 July 1947 , Mountbatten Papers,fi/e 194.
  • 6Memo by the secretary of state, encl. in Pethick- Lawrence to Attlee, 21 Dee 1946, TOP, ix. p. 398.
  • 7《蒙巴顿方案》第5条,载http://www.b1.uk/reshelp/findhelpregion/asia/india/indianindependence/index.html.
  • 8Viceroy' s interview no. 46, 10 April 1947, TOP, x. p. 187.
  • 9V.P. Menon, The Integration of the Indian States, pp. 108 -109.
  • 10V. P. Menon, The Integration of lndian States, p. 109.

二级参考文献7

  • 1S.H.Patil.The Congress Party and Princely States[M].New Delhi:Himalaya Publishing House,1981.
  • 2Sumit Sarkar.Mordern India,1885-1947[M].Del-hi:Macmilan India LTD,1983.
  • 3Brbara N.Ramusack.The New Cambridge History ofIndia.6 Indian Princes and Their States[M].London:Cambridge University Press,2004.
  • 4Robin Jeffrey.People,Princes and Paramount Power[M].Delhi:Oxford University Press,1978.
  • 5Mridula Mukherjee.India's Struggle For Indepen-dence[M].New Delhi:Penguin Books India PvtLtd,1988.
  • 6Ian Copland.The Princes of India in the End Game ofEmpire,1917-1947[M].London:Cambridge Uni-versity Press,1997.
  • 7S.R.Ashton.British Policy towards the IndianStates,1905-1939[M].New Delhi:Selectbook Ser-vice Syndicsate,1985.

共引文献1

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部