摘要
本文通过对英国功能学派"史前史"的考察,再联系发生在中国的一些田野调查实践,对"马凌诺斯基革命"进行了重新思考。文章指出:田野调查早已有之,不能将"田野调查革命"和田野调查的起源混为一谈;后来被归功于"马凌诺斯基革命"的许多东西在1922年之前已有表述,我们在承认马凌诺斯基贡献的同时,也应注意到他承袭了前人的许多遗产;人类学民族志田野工作并非生来便是马凌诺斯基式的,它原本可以有别的样态;现代民族志和功能主义的联合并非逻辑意义上的唯一可能性。
Based on the survey of the "prehistory" of British functionalist school and some practice of fieldwork in China,this paper reflects on the "Malinowski revolution" in the areas as follows;The origin of fieldwork preceded the "fieldwork revolution" in terms of time;some of the insights that were later attributed to " Malinowski revolution" had already been established before 1922;Malinowski’ s indebtedness to the predecessors are also worth noticing when his contribution is to be recognized;the anthropological fieldwork was not born Malinowskian,on account of the existence of the other styles of "field";and the combination of modern ethnography and functionalism was not the only logical probability.
出处
《世界民族》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期37-43,共7页
Journal of World Peoples Studies
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"人类学的国家传统及其创新研究"(项目号:12CMZ018)
霍英东教育基金会基础性研究课题资助项目(项目号:141094)的成果