期刊文献+

新一轮国际知识产权规则重构下的中国选择——以知识产权强国建设为目标 被引量:23

Chinese Selection under the New Round of Reconstruction of International Intellectual Property Rules
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在知识产权国际规则面临加速重构的背景下,分析我国在相关国际组织、多边和区域等平台上参与知识产权国际规则制定中应持的基本态度与立场,以及在当前形势下我国参与知识产权国际规则面临的机遇与挑战。结合当前我国对外开放新形势和我国知识产权国际竞争力的提升,认为我国应以更加积极有为的态度参与新一轮国际知识产权规则的制定,并从总体策略和具体应对措施两个方面提出了对策建议。 Under the background of accelerative reconstruction of intellectual property international rules, this paper analyzes China's basic attitudes and positions when participating in formulation of international intellectual property rules on the relevant international organizations, multilateral and regional platforms, as well as analyzes the opportunities and challenges when China participates in international intellectual property rules in the current situation. Combined with China's new situation of opening up and enhancement of the international competitiveness of China's intellectual property currently, this paper holds that we should be more positive to participate in the new round of formulation of international intellectual property rules, and puts forward suggestions from the two aspects of overall strategy and specifi c measures.
作者 李俊 崔艳新
机构地区 商务部研究院
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期10-16,共7页 Intellectual Property
关键词 知识产权 规则重构 国际影响力 intellectual property reconstruction of rules international infl uence
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1杨国华.G8峰会再议知识产权保护[J].WTO经济导刊,2007(7):93-93. 被引量:3
  • 2常雁.2010-08-04.中印指责<反假冒贸易协议>与WTO规则不符[EB/OL].http://www.cacs.gov.cn/cacs/newcommon/details.aspx?articleld=100771.
  • 3李增伟.2012-01-26.波兰爆发近年来最大规模反对ACTA协定示威[N].人民网.http://world.people.com.cn/GB/16951117.html.
  • 4Drahos, P. 2002. Negotiating Intellectual Property Rights:Between Coercion and Dialogue[M].in Peter Drahos and Ruth Mayne (eds.), Global Intellectual Property Right: Knowledge, Access and Development, Hamphshire: Palgrave Macmillan Flynn S. 2012. Wyden Amendment Needed to Challenge Dubious ACTA Justification[EB/OL]. infojustice. org, March 20, 2012,http://infojustice.org/archives/9072.
  • 5Kaminski, M. 2011. An Overview and the Evolution of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement[J]. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, 2011(21):385-390.
  • 6Love, J. 2009. Who are the cleared advisors that have access to secret ACTA documents?, Knowledge Ecology International, 13 October 2009.
  • 7Love, J. 2010. China Describes TRIPS Council Proposal on ACTA and Other Plurilateral Enforcement Agreements[R]. July 07,2010, http://keionline.org/node/883.
  • 8Lynn, J. 2009. States clash over anti-counterfeiting enforcement[EB/OL],http://in.mobile.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idINIndia-49179920100609.
  • 9Masnick, M. 2012. European Parliament official in charge of ACTA quits, and denounces the 'Masquerade' behind ACTA[N]. Techdirt,27 January 2012.
  • 10Sell, S, 2008. The Global IP Upward Ratchet, Anti-Counterfeiting And Piracy Enforcement Efforts: The State of Play [J]. June 9, 2008,PIJIP Research Paper no. 15. American University Washington College of Law.

同被引文献259

引证文献23

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部