知识领域的公共悖论与学术评价的伦理可能

The Public Paradox of Knowledge Area and the Ethic Possibility of Academic Evaluation

知识领域是社会总分工、总运行体系中的一个领域和环节。知识的不断地去神圣性、日常化,以及公共性的不断增加,是知识与学术发展的历史趋势。但在现实中,学术领域往往表现出具体的准私人性。学术领域、学术评价、学术活动具有深刻的政治性、行政性、社会性、情感性。增加学术评价的标准和过程的公开度,推进评价委员会及其人员的定期流动,对推进学术评价的伦理化,实现学术评价的公平、公正,具有基础意义。我国的学术期刊承担了重要的学术评价功能,提升学术期刊的质量与水平,对推进学术评价的伦理化具有重要作用。日益复杂的办刊语境,对学术期刊发展是挑战,也为未来的期刊领袖提供了难得的创新与发展机遇。

The knowledge area is a part of the total social division of labor. The historical trend of the knowledge area is increasingly anti-holiness,routine,and publicity. But in reality,the knowledge area often shows some private nature. The academic sector,academic evaluation and academic activity are political,administrative,social and emotional actions. To open the standard,process of the academic evaluation is to add the justice,fairness on academic evaluation. Chinese academic journals undertake some function of academic evaluation. Lifting the quality and level of the academic journal has value to ethicizing of academic evaluation. Complicated environment is both challenge and opportunity for academic journals and the journal leaders in the future.