期刊文献+

从索尼兴衰看企业竞争优势及其持续性 被引量:1

An Observation of Enterprise Competitiveness and Sustainability from the Rise and Fall of Sony
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于索尼公司财务绩效逐年下滑的原因众说纷纭,专家学者们纷纷从绩效管理、体制僵化、创新乏力、战略失误、宏观经济等角度给出多种解释。索尼获得竞争优势的根源是什么?又是什么原因使得索尼强大的竞争优势逐渐丧失?从企业竞争优势理论看,核心能力由技术、管理、制度、文化等维度构成,索尼正是拥有了核心能力而获得了竞争优势,但是突破性技术出现时,索尼没有对其核心能力进行更新和再造以获得动态能力,导致核心能力因范式刚性而使其竞争优势消失。当技术范式改变临近时,企业要保持竞争优势,必须从技术、管理、制度、文化等维度,构建或者重置能力。因此,拥有动态能力是企业获得持续竞争优势的关键。 Experts have been trying to explain the yearly decline of Sony's financial performance from vari- ous angles:performance management, rigid economic structure, lack of innovation, strategic mistakes and macro economy, etc. From what origin does Sony gain it's competitive advantage? And why is Sony gradu- ally losing it? From the perspective of enterprise competitive advantage theory, core competence is consis- ted of dimensions such as technology, management, constitution and culture, etc. And having such core competence is the reason why Sony has gained its competitive advantage. But when the new technology has break through, Sony has failed to renew and reforge its core competence in order to obtain dynamic a- bility. And this therefore, causing a normal form rigidity of core competence, hence leading to a loss of competitive advantage. When a normal form changing awaits,in order to keep enterprise competitive ad- vantage, we must construct or rebuild the competence within the dimensions of technology, management, institution and culture etc. Having a dynamic capability is the key of sustainable competitive advantage in enterprises.
机构地区 吉林大学商学院
出处 《现代日本经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期86-94,共9页 Contemporary Economy OF Japan
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"中国情境下制度环境对创新绩效的作用机制研究"(15BGL008) 国家软科学研究计划项目"经济转型中的制度质量与区域创新能力:一个跨区域的实证研究"(2010GXS5D195)
关键词 竞争优势 核心能力 动态能力 核心刚性 能力钝化 competitive advantage, core competence, dynamic ability, core rigidity, ability passivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1迈克尔·波特.竞争战略[M].北京:华夏出版社,1997.132-148.
  • 2PRABALAD C K and GARY HAMEL. The Core Competence of the Corporation[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1990 (6) :79 -91.
  • 3BARTON D L. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradoxin Managing New Product Development[ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1992,13 ( 8 ) : 111 - 125.
  • 4邹国庆,徐庆仑.核心能力的构成维度及其特性[J].中国工业经济,2005(5):96-103. 被引量:41
  • 5TEECE D J, PISANO G, and SCHUEN A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management [ J]. Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 1997,18 ( 7 ) :509 - 533.
  • 6吴价宝,达庆利.企业核心能力的系统性识别[J].中国软科学,2002(10):51-55. 被引量:30
  • 7Foster R N. Assessing Technological Treats[J]. Research Management, 1986 ( 8 ) : 17 - 20.

二级参考文献15

  • 1JamesM Utterback 高建 李明译.把握创新[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1999.18 -27.
  • 2多萝西·伦纳德·巴顿.知识与创新[M].北京:新华出版社,2000..
  • 3Prahalad,C.K.and Gary Hamel.The core competence of the corporation[J].Harvard Business Review,1990,68(5/6):79- 91.
  • 4[丹麦 ]尼古莱 .J.福斯 , 克里斯第安 .克努森编 , 李东红译 .企业万能 : 面向企业能力理论[M].大连 : 东北财经大学出版社 , 1998.13- 14.
  • 5[英 ]安德鲁 .坎贝尔 , 凯瑟琳 .萨默斯 .卢斯 .核心能力战略 : 以核心竞争力为基础的战略[M].大连 : 东北财经大学出版社 , 1999.1- 7.
  • 6Barney,J.B.Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J].Journal of Management, 1991,(17):99- 120.
  • 7Javidan,Mansour.Core Competence:What Does it Mean in Practice?[J].Long Range Planning, 1998,31(1):60- 71.
  • 8Markides,C.C.and P.Williamson.Related diversification,core competencies,and corporate performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,1994,(15):137- 149.
  • 9安德鲁·坎贝尔.核心能力战略[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,1999..
  • 10加里·哈默.战略柔性[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000..

共引文献457

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部