2Hellings P,G. Bertin,and M. Vanbelle. Effect of lacticacid bacte-ria on silage fermentation. 1985 : 932 — 933 in Proc. 15th Int.Grassl. Congr. Kyotosyuppan, Kyoto*Japan.
9Phillip L E. Effects treating lucerne with an inoculum of lacticacidbacteria or formic acid upon chemical changes during fer-mentation andupon the nutritive value of the silage for lambs[J]. Grass and ForageScience. 1990,(45) :337 —344.
10Chamberlain D C. The rate of addition of formic acid to grassatensilage and the subsequent digestion of the silage in the ru-men andintestine of sheep[J]. Grass and Forage Science. 1982,?37):159-164.
5Phillip L E. Effects treating lucerne with an inoculum of lactic acid bacteria or formic acid upon chemical changes during fermentation, and upon the nutritive value of the silage for lambs [J]. Grass and Forage Science, 1990,(45): 337～344
6Carpirero C H. The effect of some pre-treatments on proteolysis during the ensilage of herbage [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1979,(34): 311-315
7Kennedy S J. Comparison of the fermentation quality and nutritive value of sulfuric and formic acid treated silage fed to beef cattle[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 1990, (44): 371
8McDonald P. The biochemistry of silage[M]. Willy: Chichester,1981
9Chamberlain D G. The rate of addition of formic acid to grass at ensilage and the subsequent digestion of the silage in the rumen and intestine of sheep[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 1982, (37):159-164
