期刊文献+

超薄角膜瓣与普通角膜瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)的对比研究 被引量:4

Comparative Study and Analyses of Clinical Results between Ultra Thin-flap and Thick-flap of LASIK
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过观察制作超薄角膜瓣的准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术与制作普通角膜瓣的准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(laser in situ keratomlleusis,LASIK)对术后角膜像差的影响,并对结果进行对比分析,探讨超薄角膜瓣对LASIK手术效果的影响。方法对笔者医院80例近视患者共计160眼,其中制作超薄角膜瓣后行LASIK手术的40例,设为超薄瓣组,制作普通角膜瓣后行LASIK手术的40例,设为普通瓣组。另外,在各组里面按照近视度数不同,分为超薄瓣A组(≤-6.00D)及超薄瓣B组(>-6.00D);普通瓣A组(≤-6.00D)及普通瓣B组(>-6.00D),术后1个月时进行检查,同时与各组中患者手术前的视力及球差、慧差、总体像差(RMS)、高阶像差(RMSH)及低阶像差(RMSL)进行比较。结果在手术前后的比较中,术后超薄瓣组和普通瓣组中球差、慧差、总体像差(RMS)、高阶像差(RMSH)及低阶像差(RMSL)均较术前有明显增加(P<0.01);在中低度近视范围内,超薄瓣组手术前后的球差、慧差、总体像差(RMS)的增加值与中低度近视普通瓣组相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在高度近视范围内,超薄瓣组与普通瓣组的球差、慧差、总体像差(RMS)、低阶像差(RMSL)及高阶像差(RMSH)的增加值比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论制作超薄瓣和制作普通角膜瓣的LASIK手术,术后视力及视觉效果并没有明显的区别,但制作超薄瓣对于中高度近视的安全性更高,所以其值得临床应用和推广。 Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the corneal wave-front aberration through comparing Ultra Thin-Flap with Thick-Flap of LASIK (Laser in Situ Keratomlleusis). Methods Eighty cases of 160 eyes, 40 of which underwent Ultra Thin-Flap group,another 40 cases with thick-flap group, meanwhile according to the different degrees of myopia,each group was divided into Ultra thin-flapA group(≤ -6.00D) and ultra thin-flap B group(〉-6.00D), and thick-flap A group(≤ -6.00D) and Thick-Flap B group. We compared the two groups of patients before and first month after surgery, include vision and visual quality, spherical aberration, coma, total aberration RMS, low order aberrations RMS, higher order aberrations RMS. Results The spherical aberration, coma, total aberration RMS, low order aberrations and higher order aberrations RMS increased more significantly compared with preoperative (P〈0.01) in both ultra thin-flap group and thick-flap group month after surgery. Between the low myopia group(≤ -6.00D) and high myopia group(〉-6.00D), the spherical aberration, coma, total aberration RMS, low order aberrations and higher order aberrations RMS had no significient difference compared with two group(P〉0.05). Conclusion The visions and visual quality of ultra thin-flap group were not better than which in the Thick-Flap group postoperative, and ultra thin-flap with LASIK is more safety and effectively thanThick-Flap.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2015年第12期128-131,共4页 Journal of Medical Research
关键词 超薄角膜瓣 像差 准分子激光 Ultra thin - flap Corneal wave - front aberration Excimer laser
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Shemesh G, Soiberman U, Kurtz S. lntraoeular pressure measure- ments with Goldmann applana - tion tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes after IntraLASIK or LASEK[ J]. Clin Ophtbalmol, 2012,6 : 1967 - 1970.
  • 2O'Brart DP, Williams K. Pterygium after hyperopie laser- assisted sub - epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) [ J]. Clin Exp Optom, 2013, 96(3) :336 -338.
  • 3Smadja D, Santhiago MR, Krueger RR, et al, Wave frontablation pro- files inrefraetive surgery : description, results, andlimitations[J]. Re- fract Surg, 2012, 28(3) :224 -232.
  • 4Dirani M,Couper T, Yau J, et al. Long term refractive outcomes and stability after exeimer laser surgery formyopia [ J ]. Cataract Refract Surg, 2010, 36(10) :1709 -1717.
  • 5李丽,王建仓,张华,郭秀瑾,李凡.SBK与LASEK治疗高度近视的比较研究[J].河北医科大学学报,2012,33(8):900-903. 被引量:9
  • 6范罕英,张玙,杜之渝.飞秒激光与机械刀制瓣LASIK术后视觉质量的研究进展[J].眼科新进展,2013,33(7):697-700. 被引量:13
  • 7Lai JA, Wang IJ, Hsieh YT. Persistent adherence of lens capsule fragment to posterior corneal surface after cataract surgery [ J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2012,47 (6) : 51 -52.
  • 8买志彬,刘苏冰,聂晓丽,唐秀侠,孙宏霞,辛宝莉.飞秒激光与机械角膜刀制瓣准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后视觉质量对比分析[J].中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志,2013,15(7):409-413. 被引量:22
  • 9Lombardo M, De Santo MP, Lombardo G, et al. Surface quality offemtosecond dissected posterior human eorneal stroma investigated with atomic force microscopy[J]. Cornea, 2012,31 (12) : 1369 -1375.
  • 10Smadja D,Santhiago MR,Mello GR, et al. Response of the posterior corneal surface to myopic laser in situ keratomileusis with different ab- lation depths [J]. Cataract Refract Surg, 2012, 38 (7) : 1222 - 1231.

二级参考文献62

  • 1Xiao-Xiao Zhang,Xing-Wu Zhong,Jun-Shu Wu,Zheng Wang,Ke-Ming Yu,Quan Liu,and Bin Yang.Corneal flap morphological analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond lasers versus mechanical microkeratome[J].International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition),2012,5(1):69-73. 被引量:9
  • 2陈跃国,夏英杰,仲艳莹.M2显微角膜刀制作角膜瓣可预测性分析[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2004,22(7):532-534. 被引量:27
  • 3王铮,杨斌,黄肖虹,黄国富,邱平,陈家祺.散瞳前后瞳孔中心偏移对波前引导准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术手术的影响[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,4(1):24-26. 被引量:11
  • 4DURRIE DS,SLADE SG,MARSHALL J.Wavefront-guided excimer laser ablation using photorefractive keratectomy and subBowman′s keratomileusis:a contralateral eye study[J].J Refract Surg,2008,24(1):77-84.
  • 5NISHIMURA R,NEGISHI K,SAIKI M,et al.No forward shifting of posterior corneal surface in eyes undergoing LASIK[J].J Ophthalmol,2007,114(6):1104-1110.
  • 6OBATA H,TSURU T.Corneal wound healing from the perspective of keratoplasty specimens with special reference to the function of the bowman layer and descemet membrane[J].J Cornea,2007,26(9 Suppl 1):s82-89.
  • 7Nakano K,Nakano E,Oliveira M,Portellinha W,Alvarenga L. In-traoperative microkeratome complications in 47 ,094 laser in situkeratomileusis surgeries [J]. J Refract Surg, 2004,20(5 Suppl):S723-726.
  • 8vonJagow B,Kohnen T. Comeal architecture of femtosecond la-ser and microkeratome flaps imaged by anterior segment opticalcoherence tomography [ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2009,35(1) :3541.
  • 9Tanna M,Schallhom SC, Hettinger KA. Femtosecond laser ver-sus mechanical microkeratome : a retrospective comparison ofvisual outcomes at 3 months [ J]. J Refract Surg,2009, 25 (7Suppl) :S668-671.
  • 10Montes-Mico R,Rodriguez-Galietero A,Alio JL. Femtosecond la-ser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia [J]. Ophthal-mology ,2001,114(1 ):62-68.

共引文献53

同被引文献59

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部