期刊文献+

破坏性行为对渠道合作和绩效的影响:治理机制的权变作用 被引量:6

The Effect of Destructive Behaviors on Channel Cooperation and Performance:The Contingent Role of Governance Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章基于破坏性的视角,考察了渠道中不公平行为和投机行为对渠道成员合作和绩效的影响,以及合同和私人关系作为渠道中重要正式和非正式治理机制在这一影响过程中的调节作用。以制造商及其与经销商的关系为研究对象,获得211个生产制造商的样本,应用多元层次回归方法对研究假设进行检验。研究结果表明,不公平行为对合作有显著的负向影响,投机行为对渠道合作的影响不显著;原本投机行为与渠道合作之间的不显著关系在引入治理机制的调节效应后变得显著,合同的详细性会加剧不公平和投机行为对合作的影响,而私人关系则会有效降低不公平行为和投机行为对合作的影响,降低它们的破坏性。 Based on the perspective of destructive effect,the paper explores the effects of unfair behaviors and opportunisticbehaviors on channel members' cooperation and performance,as well as the moderating roles of contracts and personalguanxi in this process,which represent the important formal governance mechanism and the informal governance mechanismin channels respectively. Taking manufactures and their relationship with distributors as the research object and based on 211 samples collected from manufacturers,the study tests the research hypotheses by multiple regression analysis. The resultsshow that,unfair behaviors play a significant negative role in cooperation,and opportunistic behaviors have no significant ef-fect on cooperation;The original inapparent relationship between opportunistic behaviors and channel cooperation becomessignificant after introducing the moderating role of governance mechanism,contract explicitness often aggravates the effect ofunfair behaviors and opportunistic behaviors on channel cooperation,while personal guanxi can effectively reduce the effect ofunfair behaviors and opportunistic behaviors on channel cooperation as well as their destructive effect.
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期162-170,共9页 East China Economic Management
基金 国家自然科学基金重大项目(71132005) 上海高校青年教师培养资助计划(ZZyy15126) 上海应用技术学院引进人才科研启动基金项目(YJ2015-2)
关键词 不公平行为 投机行为 渠道合作 合同详细性 私人关系 unfair behavior opportunistic behavior channel cooperation contract explicitness personal guanxi
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Wathne K H, Heide J B. Opportunism in Interfirnl Relation- ships : Forms, Outcomes, and Solutions [ J ]. Journal of Market- ing, 2000,64 (4) : 36-51.
  • 2Das T K, Teng B. Instabilities of Strategic Alliances:an In- ternal Tensions Perspective [J]. Organization Science, 2000, 11(1):77-101.
  • 3Hibbard J D, Kumar N, Stern L W. Examining the Im- pact of Destructive Acts in Marketing Channel Relationships [ J ]. Journal of Marketing, 2001,38 ( 1 ) : 45-61.
  • 4Jap S D, Ganesan S. Control Mechanisms and the Relation- ship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific In- vestments and Developing Commitment [J]. Journal of Mar- keting Research, 2000,37 (2) : 227-245.
  • 5Scheer L K, Kumar N, Steepnkamp J E M. Reactions to Per- ceived Inequity in U. S. and Dutch Interorganizational Re- lationships [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003,45 (3) :303-316.
  • 6Samaha S A, Palmatier R W, Dant R P. Poisoning Relation- ships, Perceived Unfairness in Channels of Distribution [J]. Journal of Marketing,2011,75(5) :99-117.
  • 7Yang D, Sivadas E, Kang B, et al. Dissolution Intention in Channel Relationships: An Examination of Contributing [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2012,41 (7) : 1106-1113.
  • 8任星耀,朱建宇,钱丽萍.如何医治中毒的渠道关系?——沟通与专项投资作用研究[J].经济管理,2012,38(6):91-101. 被引量:5
  • 9Achrol R S, Gundlach G T. Legal and Social Safeguards Against Opportunism in Exchange[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1999,75(1 ) : 107-124.
  • 10Wuyts S, Geyskens I. The Formation of Buyer-- Supplier Re- lationships: Detailed Contract Drafting and Close Partner Selection[J]. Journal of Marketing,2005,69(4) : 103-117.

二级参考文献129

共引文献142

同被引文献118

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部