期刊文献+

远期运费协议与粮食期货市场的波动溢出关系 被引量:1

Volatility spillover effect between forward freight agreement and grain futures market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从金融视角出发,探究远期运费协议和粮食期货市场之间的波动溢出关系.粮食作为世界三大干散货类型之一,具备相当成熟的期货交易市场,故选取远期运费协议(forward freight agreement,FFA)和巴拿马(Panamax)型船主要运载的粮食期货类型进行研究.首先,采取统计特征分析及协整检验对日收益序列进行分析;然后,通过建立广义自回归条件异方差(generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity,GARCH)模型,分析两个市场间的相关性并对比其波动性.结果表明,粮食期货市场在收益和波动性上均引导FFA市场的变化,论证了GARCH族模型检验波动溢出特征的有效性,并为干散货航运市场参与者和投资者提供理论参考. From the financial point of view, this paper investigates volatility spillovers between forward freight agreement(FFA) and grain futures market. As one of the three major dry bulk cargoes in the world, grain has a mature futures market. FFA and main grain futures transported by Panamax are studied. First, statistical characteristics and co-integration relation of daily return series are analyzed and inspected. A generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity(GARCH) model is then constructed to analyze correlation and volatility spillover. The results indicate that the grain futures market leads to the changes of FFA market with respect to return and volatility. Thus, this paper demonstrates effectiveness of GARCH-class model to test volatility spillover, providing a theoretical basis for shipping operators.
出处 《上海大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期774-783,共10页 Journal of Shanghai University:Natural Science Edition
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)资助项目(2013A2041106) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101088 71301101) 教育部博士点基金资助项目(20113121120002)
关键词 远期运费协议 粮食期货 波动溢出性 自回归条件异方差模型 forward freight agreement(FFA) grain futures volatility spillover generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity(GARCH) model
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1GEORGE R. Ninety percent of everything: inside shipping, the invisible industry that puts clothes on your back, gas in your car, and food on your plate [M]. London: Henry Holt & Company, 2013: 128-146.
  • 2WAHAB M, LASHGARI M. Price dynamics and error correction in stock index and stock index futures markets: a cointegration approach [J]. Futures Market, 1993, 13(7): 711-742.
  • 3FLEMING J, OSTDIEK B, WHALEY a E. Trading costs and the relative rates of price discovery in stock, futures and options markets [J]. Futures Market, 1996, 16(3): 353-387.
  • 4Yu T H, BESSLER D A, FULLER S W. Price dynamics in US grain and freight markets [J]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 55(3): 381-397.
  • 5HAIGH M S, BRYANT H L. The effect of barge and ocean freight price volatility in international grain markets [J]. Agricultural Economics, 2001, 25(1): 41-58.
  • 6COPPOLA A. Forecasting oil price movements: exploiting the information in the futures mar- ket [J]. Futures Market, 2008, 28(1): 34-56.
  • 7KAVUSSANOS M G. Business risk measurement and management in the cargo carrying sector of the shipping industry [M]. London: Lloyds of London Press, 2010: 709-743.
  • 8CHNG M T. Economic linkages across commodity futures: hedging and trading implications [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2009, 33(5): 958-970.
  • 9FUNG H G, LIU Q F, TSE Y. The information flow and market efficiency between the U.S. and Chinese aluminum and copper futures markets [J]. Futures Markets, 2010, 30(12): 1192-1209.
  • 10KAVUSSANOS M, VISVIKIS I, DIMITRAKOPOULOS D. Information linkages between Panamax freight derivatives and commodity derivatives markets [J]. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2010, 12: 91-110.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部