期刊文献+

药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干远端分叉病变的长期预后 被引量:1

Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents implanted in distal unprotected left main coronary artery lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估使用药物洗脱支架(drug-eluting stents,DES)治疗无保护左主干(unprotected left main coronary artery,ULMCA)远端分叉病变的长期预后。方法回顾性入选2005年1月至2009年12月因ULMCA远端分叉病变行DES置入的111例患者。以随访过程中发生的主要不良心脑血管事件(major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event,MACCE)作为研究终点,包括死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、脑血管意外以及靶病变血运重建(target lesion revascularization,TLR)。结果 111例患者的平均年龄为(65.6±10)岁,其中24例(21.6%)合并糖尿病,35例(31.5%)左主干分叉病变为Medina 1,1,1型,88例(79.3%)接受必要时T支架术。中位随访时间为2.3年,随访过程中34例(30.6%)复查冠状动脉造影。无MACCE事件的生存率为87.4%,无TLR的生存率为94.6%,糖尿病是TLR的独立预测因素(OR 2.62,95%CI 1.12~1.62,P=0.004)。结论使用DES治疗ULMCA远端分叉病变是安全并且有效的。 Objective To evaluate the long-term clinical outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention( PCI) with drug-eluting stents( DES) for distal unprotected left main coronary artery( ULMCA) lesions. Methods Between Jan 2005 and Dec 2009,111 patients with distal ULMCA disease who underwent drug-eluting stents implantation were enrolled in this retrospective study. The primary end points were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event( MACCE) at follow-up,including death,nonfatal myocardial infarction,cerebrovascular event and target lesion revascularization( TLR). Results Patients were 65. 6 ± 10 years old. 21. 6% were diabetic. 31. 5% of the left main bifurcations were classed as Medina 1,1,1. Provisional T stent technique was performed for 79. 3% of the population. 30. 6% of cases underwent angiography follow-up. The median follow-up time was 2. 3 years,the MACCE-free survival was 87. 4% and the estimated freedom from TLR was 94. 6%. Diabetes mellitus was identified as the predictor of TLR. Conclusions PCI with DES for distal ULMCA disease was safe and effective when the strategy was made based on the case-by-case assessment.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2015年第11期612-616,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 冠心病 左主干 分叉病变 药物洗脱支架 Coronary artery disease Left main Bifurcation Drug-eluting stents
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1Naganuma T, Chieffo A, Meliga E, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after pereutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for ostial/naidshaft lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery from the DELTA registry: a multicenter registry evaluating pereutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2014 ,7 :354-361.
  • 2Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, et ai. Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between pereutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial. Circulation, 2014, 129: 2388-2394.
  • 3Athappan G,Patvardhan E, Tuzeu ME, et al. Left main coronary artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv,2013,6: 1219-1230.
  • 4Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, et al. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus-and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stentts. N Engl J Med, 2007,356:998-1008.
  • 5Rasmussen K,Maeng M, Kaltoft A, et al. Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stems in routine clinical care ( SORT OUT Ⅲ ) : a randomised controlled superiority trial. Lancet ,2010,375 : 1090-1099.
  • 6Almudarra SS, Gale CP, Baxter PD, et al. Comparative outcomes after unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention: a national linked cohort study of 5,065 acute and elective cases from the BCIS Registry (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society). JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2014,7: 717- 730.
  • 7Bemelli C, Chieffo A, Buchanan GL, et al. New-generation drug- eluting stent experience in the percutaneous treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease : the NEST registry. J Invasive Cardiol,2013 ,25 :269-275.
  • 8Kim YH, Park DW, Ahn JM, et al. Everolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. The PRECOMBAT-2 (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stentt in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) study. JACC Cardiovase Interv,2012,5:708-717.
  • 9Mehilli J, Richardt G, Valgimigli M, et al. Zotarolimus- versus everolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol,2013 ,62 :2075-2082.
  • 10NaganumaT, Chieffo A, Meliga E, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/roid- shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery : the DELTA Registry ( drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease ):a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv ,2013,6 : 1242-1249.

共引文献5

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部