期刊文献+

临床检验危急结果报告的规范化 被引量:1

Normalization of Critical Result Reporting in Laboratory Medicine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 危急结果可能意味着一个危及生命或者可能导致有意义的患者发病或不可逆损害或死亡并因此需要紧急的医疗关注和行动的病理生理状态。因此,危急结果的及时和准确报告对患者安全极其重要。国际认可和患者安全标准要求医学实验室拥有用于及时可靠的将危急结果报告给负责患者的医护人员的系统。许多文献中描述了各种各样的危急结果报告实践和技术。然而,全国性调查显示出了现存危急结果报告的缺点和不足。以这些文献为基础,该文对各种报告实践进行了总结。希望能提出一致性术语,同时提供一个设计更好和更循证的能及时通知可能危害患者安全的实验室结果的方法。 Critical result was a test result which may signify a pathophysiologic state that is potentially life threatening or that could result in significant patient morbidity or irreversible harm or mortality and therefore requires urgent medical attention and action. Thus the timeliness and accuracy of critical results reporting is really important for patient safety. International accreditation and patient safety standards require pathology laboratories to have a system for the timely and reliable commu- nication of alert results to clinical personnel responsible for patient care. Various practices and a number of different termi- nologies of critical results reporting have been described in the literature. However,multinational surveys highlighted short- comings and inefficiencies in existing communication systems. Based on these literatures, several reporting practices were summarized in this article, hoping to provide harmonized terms as well as more evidence-based systems for the timely notification of laboratory results.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第6期1-6,共6页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
基金 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(基金编号:71431821),北京医院资助课题(BJ-2015-025).
关键词 危急结果 医学检验 患者安全 critical results clinical laboratory patient safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Walz SE, Darcy TP. Patient safety and post-analytical error[J]. Clin Lab Med,2013,33(1) :183-194.
  • 2Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values [J]. Med Lab Obs,1972(4):47-54.
  • 3International Organization for Standardization. Medi- cal laboratories-requirements for quality and compe- tence[S]. Switzerland:Geneva ISO15189,2012.
  • 4The Joint Commission' s. 2011 National Patient Safety Goals, Laboratory Accreditation Program lOLl. ht- tp://www, jointcommission, org/assets/1/18/NPSG _Chapter_Jan2013_LAB. pdf(last accessed 1 Septem- ber 2013).
  • 5College of American Pathologists. Commission on La- boratory Accreditation, Laboratory Accreditation Pro- gram. Laboratory general checklist-questions related to reporting of results only[OL]. GEN. 41320-41340 http://www, cap. org/apps/docs/pathology _ repor- ting/LabGeneralChecklist_Reporting, pdf. 2005. last accessed 1September 2013.
  • 6Clinical Pathology Accreditation Standards for Medi- cal Laboratories[OL]. Ltd, UK ; Version2.02 ; Novem- ber 2010. http://www, cpa-uk, co. uk/files/PD-LAB- Standards_ v2. 02 _ Nov_ 2010. pdf ( last accessed 1 September 2013).
  • 7Singh H,Vij MS. Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results[J]. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf,2010,36(5):226-232.
  • 8Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory crit- ical values policies and procedures:a college of Ameri- can pathologists Q-probes study in 623 institutions [J]. Arch Pathol +Lab Med, 2002,126 (6) : 663-669.
  • 9Lippi G, Banff G, Buttarello M, et al. Recommenda- tions for detection and management of unsaitable sam- ples in clinical laboratories[J]. 2007,45(6):728-736.
  • 10Piva E, Sciacovelli L, Laposata M, et al. Assessment of critical values policies in Italian institutions:com+ parison with the US situation [J ]. Clin Chem Lab Med,2010,48(4) :461-468.

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部