期刊文献+

健康成人血浆D-二聚体免疫比浊法正常参考区间的建立 被引量:3

Establishment of the Normal Reference Range of Plasma D-Dimer Immune by Turbidimetric Method in Healthy Adults
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的建立宝安区健康成人不同年龄段血浆D-聚体免疫比浊法生物参考区间,为临床诊断和治疗提供更科学更有价值的参考依据。方法随机选取2014年6月-2015年1月深圳市宝安区福永人民医院门诊、住院及体检科不同年龄健康成人1156例,其中男性417例,女性739例。按年龄分为18-49岁,50-59岁及〉60岁三组。采用Sysmexc A1500全自动凝血分析仪免疫比浊法检测血浆D-二聚体浓度,采用SPSS19.0对数据进行统计分析,血浆D-二聚体浓度呈偏态分布,采用百分位数(P95)表示参考区间的单侧上限,确定该区相应的生物参考区间,并分析比较不同年龄和不同性别之间血浆D-二聚体浓度之间的差异性。结果同年龄组男性和女性D-二聚体浓度水平比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.372-1.092,P均〉0.05);18-49岁组和50-59岁组健康成人血浆D-二聚体浓度水平比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.954,P〉0.05),〉60岁组与其他两组比较,血浆D-二聚体浓度差异有统计学意义(t=5.972,P〈0.05);18-59岁组D-二聚体正常参考区间为0-225mg/L;〉60岁组D-二聚体正常参考区间为0-297mg/L。结论血浆D-二聚体浓度水平与性别无关,而与年龄有关,随年龄增高D-二聚体水平呈上升趋势。因此,不同地区应建立健康成人不同年龄段D-二聚体正常值参考区间。 Objective To establish Baoan district different age healthy adults plasma D - dimer biological reference interval, for clinical diagnosis and treatment to provide more scientific and more valuable reference. Methods From June 2014 to Jan- uary 2015,randomly selected 1 156 cases of different age,among which 417 were male,female 739 cases in the hospital out- patient and inpatient and physical healthy adults. By age,they were divided into 18 to 49,50 to 59,and 〉60 years old three groups. Used Sysmex CA1500 automatic blood coagulation analyzer immune turbidimetrie method to detect plasma D-dimer concentration,statistical analysis of the data by SPSS19.0, and concentration of plasma D-dimer was skewed distribution. Used percentile (P95) to express the reference range of unilateral cap, determine the corresponding biological reference range in this area. Then analysed and compared the differences of the concentration of plasma D-dimer in people of different ages and sexes. Results The results of D-dimer level in men and women of the same age group had no statistically significant difference (t=0. 372-1. 092,P〉0.05). There was no statistically significant difference (t=0. 954,P〉0.05) in groups of 18 to 49 and 50-59 and 〉60 years old group was compared to the other two groups,the concentration of plasma D-dimer between had statistically significant difference (t= 5. 972, P〈0.05). The normal reference range of D-dimer in people of 18 to 59 was 0-225 mg/L,and 〉60 was 0-297 mg/L. Conclusion The concentrations of plasma D-dimer level has nothing to do with sex,and is associated with age,along with the age increase D-dimer level is on the rise. Different people,different in- struments using auxiliary reagents should establish its own normal reference range.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2015年第6期98-100,共3页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
基金 深圳市宝安区科技局基金项目(项目编号:2014051).
关键词 健康成人 血浆D-二聚体 免疫比浊法 参考区间 healthy adults plasma D-dimer immune turbidimetry reference range
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献44

  • 1[1]Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Bachhuber TL, et al. D-dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism. A shortcut to accurate diagnosis? [J], Arch Intern Med, 1996,156(9):939-946.
  • 2[2]Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004,140(8):589-602.
  • 3[3]Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users'guides to the medical literature. Ⅲ. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group[J]. JAMA, 1994,271(9):703-707.
  • 4[4]Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL, et al. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Clinical practice guideline. American Thoracic Society[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999,160(3):1043-1066.
  • 5[5]Gould MK. Review: of the various D-dimer assays, negative ELISA results are most useful for excluding a diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism [J]. ACP J Club, 2004,141(3):77.
  • 6[6]Bates SM, Kearon C, Crowther M, et al. A diagnostic strategy involving a quantitative latex D-dimer assay reliably excludes deep venous thrombosis [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2003,138(10):787-794.
  • 7[7]Kruip M J, Leclercq MG, van der Heul C, et al. Diagnostic strategies for excluding pulmonary embolism in clinical outcome studies. A systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2003,138(12):941-951.
  • 8[8]Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators[J]. JAMA, 1990,263(20):2753-2759.
  • 9[9]Brown MD, Rowe BH, Reeves M J, et al. The accuracy of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis[J].Ann Emerg Med, 2002,40(2):133-144.
  • 10[10]Tick LW, Ton E, van Voorthuizen T, et al. Practical diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis by clinical probability test, compression ultrasonography, and D-dimer test[J]. Am J Med,2002,113(8):630-635.

共引文献141

同被引文献38

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部