期刊文献+

丙泊酚和依托咪酯对脓毒症小鼠炎症反应与氧化应激的影响 被引量:12

Effects of propofol and etomidate on inflammation and oxidative stress in septic mice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察丙泊酚及依托咪酯对脓毒症小鼠炎症反应与氧化应激的影响。方法雄性成年BALB/c小鼠64只,随机分为四组(n=16):正常对照组(N组)、脓毒症组(S组)、丙泊酚处理组(P组)及依托咪酯处理组(E组)。脂多糖(LPS,20mg/kg)腹腔注射建立脓毒症模型,丙泊酚(60mg/kg)或依托咪酯(10mg/kg)于LPS注射后0.5h腹腔注射给药。于LPS注射后2h及6h检测血清IL-6、IL-10浓度,6h检测肺、肝、肾组织中的丙二醛(MDA)含量。结果与N组比较,S组2h及6h血清IL-6浓度明显上升(P<0.05),IL-10浓度明显下降(P<0.05);6h肺、肝、肾组织MDA含量均明显上升(P<0.05)。与S组比较,P、E两组2h及6h血清IL-6浓度均明显下降(P<0.05),IL-10浓度均明显上升(P<0.05);E组6h肺、肝、肾组织MDA含量明显下降(P<0.05),P组6h仅肺组织MDA含量明显下降(P<0.05)。E组2h血清IL-6浓度明显低于P组(P<0.05),2h及6h血清IL-10浓度明显高于P组(P<0.05);6h肺、肝、肾组织MDA含量均明显低于P组(P<0.05)。结论丙泊酚和依托咪酯腹腔注射均可减轻LPS所致脓毒症小鼠炎症反应及氧化应激损伤,且依托咪酯的作用更强。 Objective To observe the effects of propofol and etomidate on inflammation and ox-idative stress in septic mice.Methods Sixty-four male adult BALB/c mice were randomly divided into four groups:normal control group (N),sepsis group (S),propofol treatment group (P)and etomid-ate treatment group (E).The septic mice model was established by lipopolysaccharide (LPS,20 mg/kg)intraperitoneal injection,and propofol (60 mg/kg)or etomidate (10 mg/kg)was injected in the abdominal cavity at 0.5 h after LPS injection.Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6)concentrations and in-terleukin-10 (IL-10)concentrations were measured at 2 h and 6 h after LPS injection;malondialde-hyde (MDA)content of lung,liver and kidney tissue was measured at 6 h after LPS injection. Results Compared with group N,serum IL-6 concentrations increased significantly (P 〈0.05),and IL-10 concentrations decreased significantly (P 〈0.05)at 2 h and 6 h after LPS injection in group S;MDA content of lung,liver,kidney increased significantly (P 〈0.05 )at 6 h after LPS injection in group S;Compared with group S,serum IL-6 concentrations decreased significantly (P 〈0.05),and IL-10 concentrations increased significantly (P 〈 0.05 )at 2 h and 6 h after LPS injection in both group P and E;MDA content of lung,liver,kidney decreased significantly (P 〈0.05 )at 6 h after LPS injection in group E,but only MDA content of lung decreased significantly (P 〈0.05)at 6 h af-ter LPS injection in group P;Compared with group P,serum IL-6 concentrations was significantly lower (P 〈0.05),and IL-10 concentrations was significantly higher (P 〈0.05)at 2 h and 6 h after LPS injection in group E;MDA content of lung,liver,kidney was significantly lower (P 〈0.05)at 6 h after LPS injection in group E.Conclusion Both propofol and etomidate injected in the abdominal cavity can reduce injury of inflammatory and oxidative stress in septic mice induced by LPS,and the effect of etomidate is more significant.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期1221-1223,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金 中华医学会麻醉学分会科研合作资助项目(CSA2013LB006)
关键词 丙泊酚 依托咪酯 脓毒症 炎症反应 氧化应激 Propofol Etomidate Sepsis Inflammation Oxidative stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Angus IX2, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiol- ogy of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of inci- dence,outcome,and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med, 2001, 29(7): 1303-1310.
  • 2Shimaoka M, Park EJ. Advances in understanding sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl, 2008, 42: 146-153.
  • 3朱雪琦,刘清泉,姚咏明.脓毒症动物模型制备方法的研究进展[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(2):114-116. 被引量:30
  • 4Taniquchi T, Yamamoto K, Ohmoto N, et al. E{{ects of propofol on hemodynamic and inflammatory response to endo- toxemia in rats; Crit Care Med, 2000, 28(4) : 1101-1106.
  • 5Taniquehi T, Kanakura H, Yamamoto K. Effects of post treatment with propofol on mortality and cytokine responses to endotoxin-induced shock in rats. Crit Care Med, 2002, 30 (4) : 904-907.
  • 6吴敏,庞宏宣,张文斌,谭永星,石泉,林高翔.依托咪酯对体外循环直视心脏手术患者炎症因子的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(1):94-96. 被引量:17
  • 7Remick DG, Bolgos G, Copeland S, et al. Role of interleu- kin-6 in mortality from and physiologic response to sepsis. Infect Immun, 2005, 73(5); 2751-2757.
  • 8Andrades ME, Ritter C,Dal-Pizzol F. The role of free radi- cals in sepsis development. Front Biosci (Elite Ed), 2009, 1 ; 277-287.
  • 9Lopatka CW, Muzi Mebert TJ. Propofol, but not etomidate, reduces desflurane mediated sympathetic activation in hu- mans. Can J Anaesth, 1999,46 (4) : 342-347.
  • 10Cherfan AJ,Arabi YM, AI-Dorzi HM, et al. Advantages and disadvantages of etomidate use for intubation of patients with sepsis. Pharmacotherapy, 2012,32(5): 475-482.

二级参考文献31

  • 1姚咏明,盛志勇.内毒素与革兰阳性菌致病因子的协同效应与意义[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(4):193-196. 被引量:13
  • 2Hirai S. Systemic inflammatory response after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary Bypass [J].Ann Thorac Cardiovase Surg, 2003,9(6)365-370.
  • 3Boeken U, Feindt P, Schuhe H D, et al. Elastase release following myocardial ischemia during extracorporeal circulation (ECC)-marker of ongoing systemic inflammation [J]? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2002,50(30) : 136-140.
  • 4Pasie, Jagod M D. Cytokines in depression and heart failure [J]. Psychosconm Med, 2003,65( 1 ) : 18-190.
  • 5Marina M, Apostolos G, Vagenakis, et al. Dissociation of /he early deeline in serum T3 concent ration and serum IL-6 rise and TNF-a in Nonthyroidal illness syndrome induced by abdominal surgery [J]. JCEM, 2002,86(9):4198-4205.
  • 6Sanchez-Conde P. The comparative abilities of propofol and sevoflurane to modulate inflammation and oxidative stress in the kidney after aortic cross-clamping [J]. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106(2) :371-378.
  • 7Ke J J, Zhan J, Feng X B, et ah A comparison of the effect of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and inhalational anaesthesia with isoflurane on the release of pro-ande anti-inflammatory eytokines in patients undergoing open cholecystectomy [J]. Ancsth Intensive Care, 2008,36 ( 1 ) : 74-78.
  • 8Gilliland H E, Armstrong M A, Carabine U, et al. The choice of anesthetic maintenance technique influences the anti- inflammatory cytokine response to abdominal surgery [J]. Anesth Analg, 1997,85(6) : 1394-1398.
  • 9Song W, Anthony P C Y. Cytokines in myocardial injury: impact on cardiac surgical approach [J]. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg, 1999,16(Suppl 1 ) : 107.
  • 10Rau S, Kohn B, Richter C, et al. Plasma interleukin-6response is predictive for severity and mortality in canine systemic inflammator3' response syndrome and sepsis [J]. Vet Clin Pathol, 2007,36(3) :253-260.

共引文献45

同被引文献113

引证文献12

二级引证文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部