期刊文献+

认知视角中的言辞行为转喻复合体 被引量:4

Speech activity metonymic compounds in fiction novels
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文在言辞行为范畴内,以莫言小说作品为语料,对各种言辞行为转喻复合体进行了识别、描述和分析。研究发现:1)与文学隐喻一样,言辞行为转喻通过对简单转喻的综合加工,形成了转喻复合体,从而超越了日常转喻;2)言辞行为转喻复合体有两种形式:转喻链和转喻丛;3)转喻的多重结构存在于各种转喻中。我们的讨论在某种程度上解释了莫言何以为"语言大师"、认知转喻的文体功能何以体现。 In light of the notion of Speech Activity Metonymy, and based on a mini corpus of fiction novels by Mo Yan, this paper aims to explore the Speech Activity Metonymy Compound(SAMC). The results show that:(1) SAMC is the result of processing of simple metonymies;(2) SAMC falls into two distinct types: chains of metonymies and clusters of metonymies; and(3) the combination of metonymy involves every type of speech activity metonymies. The present study seeks to illustrate how metonymic motivation is relevant to stylistic effect.
作者 司建国
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期751-761,872,共11页 Modern Foreign Languages
关键词 转喻复合体 言辞行为 文学转喻 莫言 metonymic compound speech activity poetic metonymy Mo Yan
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Adel, A. 2014. Metonymy in the semantic field of verbal communication: A corpus-based analysis of WORD [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 67: 72-88.
  • 2Barcelona, A. 2011. Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy [A]. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez (eds.). Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7-60.
  • 3Barnden J. A. 2010. Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 21(1): 1-34.
  • 4Benczes, R. 2011. Putting the notion of domains back into metonymy: Evidence from compounds [A]. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez (eds.). Defining Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197- 216.
  • 5Brdar-Szabo, R. & M. Brdar. 2011. What do metonymy chains reveal about the nature of metony- my?[A]. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez (eds.). Defining Metony- my in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a Consensus View [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217- 48.
  • 6Bierwiaczonek, B. 2013. Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain [M]. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing LTD.
  • 7Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 8Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 1994. The Poetics of Mind." Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Gibbs, R. W. Jr. 2011. The strengths and weaknesses of Conceptual Metaphor Theory: A view from cognitivescienceCA].载束定芳(编),隐喻与转喻研究[C].上海:上海外语教育出版社,45-64.
  • 10Goossens, L. 1995. Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions for linguistic action [A]. In L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A. Simon- Vandenbergen & J. Vanparys (eds.). By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in a Cognitive Perspective [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 159-76.

二级参考文献66

共引文献126

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部