期刊文献+

“活动”中的英语写作教材评估与使用——来自高校英语教师的声音 被引量:19

College English teachers' assessment and use of EFL writing textbooks: An Activity Theory account
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文运用活动理论分析和探讨了高校英语教师对写作教材的评估和使用,揭示了教师如何在写作教学活动中努力定义甚至转化写作教材的角色与作用。研究发现:1)教材的评估和使用主要取决于活动系统中教师的写作教学理念、教学资源的丰富程度与教学反思的认知策略这三大中介工具以及学生的水平、兴趣和需求;2)规则、共同体与劳动分工也制约着教师的教材评估和使用;3)教师作为教学活动系统的主体,其能动性是转化教材作用的关键。研究结果表明,写作教材评估研究需要开展更多个案研究,从微观和动态的角度进一步深入揭示教材与教材使用者、教学环境的关系。 Drawing on Activity Theory, this article explores college English teachers' evaluation and use of English writing textbooks in their teaching practice, revealing how teachers struggle to make sense of writing textbooks and to transform the different roles that these textbooks play in their instruction. Findings of the study include:(1) evaluation and use of writing textbooks is most mediated by the teachers' writing beliefs, teaching resources available, reflective strategy on the one hand, and by the students' language proficiency, interests and needs on the other;(2) both the teachers' evaluation of the textbooks and their teaching practice are constrained by other factors such as rules, community and division of labor; and(3)teacher agency is found to be the key to transforming the role of textbooks and even the teaching activity.This suggests that dynamic and in-depth qualitative study should be further conducted in writing textbook evaluation in order to find out the relationship among the textbook, its users and the teaching context.
作者 林娟 战菊
机构地区 吉林大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期790-801,873,共12页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 全国教育科学规划大学外语教育专项课题"大学英语写作类教材评价与分析研究"(GPA105049) 吉林省社会科学基金外语研究专项Ⅱ"大学英语教师教材观研究"(2014WY8)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 活动理论 教材评估 英语写作 Activity Theory textbook evaluation English writing
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Angell, J., S. DuBravac & M. Gonglewski. 2008. Thinking globally, acting locally: Selecting textbooks for college level language programs [J]. Foreign Language Annals 41(3): 562-571.
  • 2Ansary, H. & E. Babaii. 2002. Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation [J]. Internet TESL Journal 2: 1-8.
  • 3Cummingsworth, A. 1995. Choosing Your Coursebook [M]. Oxford: Heinmann.
  • 4Cummings, J, B. 2007. An Activity Theory Analysis of Three Instructors ' Knowledge about Teach- ing Writing in a Pre-University English-for-Academic-Purpose: Teacher Mind as Mediated Ac- tion [D]. University of Toronto : Library and Archives Canada Heritage Branch.
  • 5EngestrOm, Y. 1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research [M]. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
  • 6EngestrOm, Y. 1993. Developmental studies of work as a test bench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice [A]. In J. Lave & S. Chaiklin (eds.). Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64-103.
  • 7Freebaim, I. 2000. The coursebook-future continuous or past? [J]. English Teaching Professional 15: 3-5.
  • 8Hall, J. K. 2001. Methods for Teaching FLs: Creating a Community of Learners in the Classroom [M]. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall.
  • 9Harmer, J. 2001. Coursebooks: A human, cultural and linguistic disaster? [J]. Modern English Teacher 10(3): 5-10.
  • 10Hyland, K. 1999. Disciplinary discourses: Writer stance in research articles [A]. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (eds.). Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices [C]. Harlow: Longman, 99-121.

二级参考文献202

共引文献561

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部