期刊文献+

全球性碳税政策作用下多国多部门经济增长与碳排放的全球治理 被引量:5

A Research of Multi-country-Multi-sector Economic Growth and Carbon Emission Governance under Global Carbon Taxes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 碳税政策是减少碳排放,减缓全球气候变化的有力手段。本文着眼于国家/部门层面,对气候-经济集成评估模型CIECIA进行碳税方面的扩展,研究了全球性碳税和碳税收入分配模式对多国多部门的经济发展和碳排放变化的影响。研究结果显示,碳税政策对发展中国家的碳减排具有明显的促进作用,但对其经济会产生一定的损害;而发达国家则受碳税影响较小。四种国家间碳税收入分配方案中,在按人口数量分配碳税的平等原则下各国碳税净流入比较接近,对中国也较为有利;而人均碳排放原则没有考虑发展中国家未来的发展需求,因此对中国最为不利,而对低碳技术发达的发达国家反而有利。将碳税收入投资知识资本以促进过程技术进步的策略可以有效提高发展中国家的碳减排量,同时促进其经济发展;而发达国家则由于本身知识资本水平较高,以及得到的碳税收入较少等原因,对技术进步策略政策并不敏感。 This paper focuses on the national / sectoral levels and expends the climate-economic IAM named CIECIA in the aspect of carbon tax to have a research on the changes of the multi-country-sector economic growth and carbon emissions under different global carbon tax rates and tax revenue distribution modes. The results indicate that carbon tax policies have obvious promoting effects on the carbon abatements of the developing countries,whereas the carbon emission reductions of the developed countries are smaller because of their low abatement potentials caused by higher initial lowcarbon technologies,lower economic growth rates,etc. In the four international carbon tax revenue distribution modes,the net carbon tax revenue flows of countries are relatively equal under the equality principle based on the population,and this principle benefits China most. The carbon emission per capita principle ignores the development demands of developing countries and thus is harmful to China,whereas developed countries benefit under this principle. Investing carbon tax revenue to technological progress will significantly increase carbon reductions of developing countries,as well as their cumulative utilities. However,developed countries are insensitive to the technological progress strategy because of their higher initial capital knowledge levels,lower carbon tax returns,etc.
作者 顾高翔 王铮
出处 《中国软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期1-11,共11页 China Soft Science
基金 国家重大研究计划(973)项目(2012CB955800)"气候变化经济过程的复杂性机制 新型集成评估模型簇与政策模拟平台研发" 国家自然科学基金(41501130)"全球一体化作用下中国应对气候变化的区域碳治理研究"
关键词 全球性碳税 碳税收入分配 集成评估模型 知识资本 过程技术进步 global carbon tax carbon tax revenue distribution integrated assessment model knowledge capital process technology progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Baranzini A, Goldemberg J, Speck S. A future for carbon taxes [J]. Ecological economics ,2000,32(3 ) :395-412.
  • 2Pearce D. The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming [J]. The Economic Journal, 1991,101 (407) :938-948.
  • 3Brandt U S, Svendsen G T. A global CO2 tax for susta- inable development? [J]. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2014,7( 1 ) :85-93.
  • 4Avi-Yonah R S, Uhlmann D M. Combating global climate change: Why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade [J]. Stanford Environmental Law Journal ,2009,28 ( 1 ) :3-50.
  • 5Zhang Z, Baranzini A. What do we know about carbon ta- xes? An inquiry into their impacts on competitiveness and dis- tribution of income [J]. Energy Policy,2004,32(4) :507-518.
  • 6Manne A S, Richels R G. The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases and carbon sinks in meeting climate objectives [J]. The Energy Journal, 2006, special issue 3 : 393- 404.
  • 7Nordhaus W D. A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies [M]. New Haven: Yale University Press ,2008.
  • 8Kitous A, Criqui P, Bellevrat E, Chateau B. Transformation patterns of the worldwide energy system-scenarios for the century with the POLES Model [J]. Energy Journal, 2010,31 ( special issue 1 ) :49-82.
  • 9Leimbach M, Bauer N, Baumstark L, Luken M, Ederxhofer O. Technological Change and International Trade-Insights from REMIND-R [J].Energy Journal,2010,31 (special issue 1 ): 109-136.
  • 10Elliott J, Foster I, Kortum S, et al. Trade and carbon taxes [J]. The American Economic Review,2010,100 (2) :465- 469.

二级参考文献32

  • 1陈文颖,吴宗鑫,何建坤.全球未来碳排放权“两个趋同”的分配方法[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(6):850-853. 被引量:96
  • 2王铮,蒋轶红,吴静,郑一萍,黎华群.技术进步作用下中国CO_2减排的可能性[J].生态学报,2006,26(2):423-431. 被引量:15
  • 3Rose A,Stevens S B,Edmonds J et al.International equity and differentiation in global warming policy.Environmental and Resource Economics,1998,12:25-51.
  • 4Bohm P,Larsen B.Fairness in a tradable-permit treaty for carbon emission reductions in Europe and the Former Soviet Union.Environmental and Resource Economics,1994,4:219-239.
  • 5Kverndokk S.Tradeable CO2 emission permits:Intial distribution as a justice problem.Environmental Values,1995,4(2):129-148.
  • 6Janssen M,Rotmans J.Allocation of fossil CO2 emission rights quantifying cultural perspectives.Ecological Economics,1995,13:65-79.
  • 7Cramton P,Kerr S.Tradable carbon permit auctions:How and why to auction not grandfather.Energy Policy,2002,30:333-345.
  • 8Steenberghe V.Core-stable and equitable allocations of greenhouse gas emission permits.CORE Discussion Papers,No 2004075.Available at SSRN:http:∥ssrn.com/abstract=683162 or doi:10.2139/ssrn.683162.
  • 9Cazorla M,Toman M.International Equity and Climate Change Policy.2000 www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-CCIB-27.pdf.
  • 10国家发展和改革委员会.中国应对气候变化国家方案,http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2007-06/04/content_635590.htm,2007.

共引文献33

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部