期刊文献+

花椒麻度感官评价自校准线性标度的建立 被引量:12

A Study on the Establishment of Labeled Line Scale for Quantitative Sensory Evaluation of Pungent Intensity of Zanthoxyluml bungeanum
原文传递
导出
摘要 麻感标度的建立是对麻味感觉强度进行量化评价的基础。本文在对评价员麻感语义描述差异性分析的基础上,采用自校准的方法,即在不改变评价员使用标度习惯和范围的前提下,通过统计分析统一评价小组的标度范围,最终建立了花椒麻度感官评价的15-cm标记线性标度。麻感标记值分别为:0.8(微麻),3.1(有点麻),6.4(麻),8.1(较麻),10.3(很麻)和12.5(特麻)。该标度本质上为等比标度,符合y=2.7321ln(x)+4.941。评价员使用该标度的重复性和一致性满足要求。重复性考察指标相对标准偏差值小于20%,一致性考察指标|En|值小于1。建立的麻感标记线性标度对于花椒麻感强度(麻度)的量化评价及开展相关研究具有重要的理论和实践意义。 It was fundamental to establish a scale for quantitative sensory evaluation of pungency intensity. Based on the difference analysis of scalingresults for those pungency descriptors, an individual-calibrated scaling method was adopted(the scaling scope was not confirmed by changing personal scaling habits or scope but unifying the scope of use by statistical analysis method) to establish a 15-cm labeled linescalethat applied to quantitative pungencysensory evaluation. The labeled value in the 15-cm line scale were 0.8(slight pungency), 3.1(minor pungency), 6.4(moderate pungency), 8.1(medium above pungency), 10.3(strong pungency) and 12.5(extreme pungency). Essentially, the liner scale was proved to be a ratio scale conformed with psychophysics laws(y =2.7321ln(x) +4.941). The repeatability indicator(RSD) was less than 20% and the consistency indicator(|En|) was less than 1. As an initial establishment of 15-cm labeled line scale, it was of great theoretical and practical significance for the study of quantitative sensory evaluation of pungency intensity(pungency degree) and related research.
出处 《中国食品学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期211-216,共6页 Journal of Chinese Institute Of Food Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31171695)
关键词 感官评价 标记线性标度 麻感 sensory evaluation labeled line scale pungentsense
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1赵镭,刘文,高永梅,史波林,汪厚银.感官分析标准中的标度技术进步[J].中国食品学报,2011,11(2):173-176. 被引量:7
  • 2Lawless HT, Hildegarde, Heymann. sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices[M]. 2nd ed. NewYork: Springer, 2010: 208-259.
  • 3Etsuko S, Yasujiro M, Yusaku I, et al. Pungent qualities of sanshool-ralated compounds evaluated by a sensory test and activation of rat TRPVI[J]. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2005, 69(10): 1951-1957.
  • 4Riera CE, Menozzi-Smarrito C, Affolter M, et al. Compounds from Sichuan and Melegueta peppers activate, cova- lently and non-covalently, TRPA1 and TRPV1 channels[J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2009, 157: 1398-1409.
  • 5GB/T21265~2007辣椒辣度的感官评价方法[S].
  • 6ASTM E1395-90 Standard test method for sensory evaluation of low heat chilies[S].
  • 7ASTM E1083-00 Standard test method for sensory evaluation of red pepper heat [S].
  • 8GB/T16291.1—2012感官分析选拔、培训与管理评价员一般导则第1部分:优选评价员[S].
  • 9GB/T 19547-2004,感官分析方法学量值估计法[S].
  • 10Gerhold KA, BautistaDM. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of trigeminal chemosensation[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2009, 7: 184-189.

二级参考文献24

共引文献120

同被引文献124

引证文献12

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部