拉德布鲁赫的法律概念对当代实证主义和非实证主义之争的启示

The inspiration of Radbruch's concept of law to the debate between Hart and Dworkin

哈特跟德沃金争论的问题是,法律的权威需要不需要背后的道德根基,这也是拉德布鲁赫的法律概念所要解决的问题。而拉德布鲁赫的"涉及价值的事实"的法律概念触发了哈特跟德沃金的争论。从德沃金对哈特的描述性的法律概念的批评以及二者对法律原则的地位的争论可以看出,拉德布鲁赫的法律理论启示了二战后以哈特跟德沃金关于法律概念的争论为代表的法律实证主义和非实证主义之间的论争。

What Hart and Dworkin debate is whether the authority of the law needs the moral basis behind it.And this the problem that Radbruch＇s concept of law attempted to solve.Radbruch＇s concept of law of value-relating fact evoked the argument between Hart and Dworkin.From Dworkin＇s criticism of Hart＇s descriptive concept of law and their argument about the position of the legal principle we can see that Radbruch＇s legal theory inspires the argument between legal positivism and non- positivism whose behalf is the argument about the concpt of law between Hart and Dworkin after the second world war.