期刊文献+

Multiscale molecular dynamics simulations of membrane remodeling by Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs family proteins

Multiscale molecular dynamics simulations of membrane remodeling by Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs family proteins
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Membrane curvature is no longer thought of as a passive property of the membrane; rather, it is considered as an ac- tive, regulated state that serves various purposes in the cell such as between cells and organelle definition. While transport is usually mediated by tiny membrane bubbles known as vesicles or membrane tubules, such communication requires complex interplay between the lipid bilayers and cytosolic proteins such as members of the Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) superfam- ily of proteins. With rapid developments in novel experimental techniques, membrane remodeling has become a rapidly emerging new field in recent years. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are important tools for obtaining atomistic information regarding the structural and dynamic aspects of biological systems and for understanding the physics-related aspects. The availability of more sophisticated experimental data poses challenges to the theoretical community for devel- oping novel theoretical and computational techniques that can be used to better interpret the experimental results to obtain further functional insights. In this review, we summarize the general mechanisms underlying membrane remodeling con- trolled or mediated by proteins. While studies combining experiments and molecular dynamics simulations recall existing mechanistic models, concurrently, they extend the role of different BAR domain proteins during membrane remodeling pro- cesses. We review these recent findings, focusing on how multiscale molecular dynamics simulations aid in understanding the physical basis of BAR domain proteins, as a representative of membrane-remodeling proteins. Membrane curvature is no longer thought of as a passive property of the membrane; rather, it is considered as an ac- tive, regulated state that serves various purposes in the cell such as between cells and organelle definition. While transport is usually mediated by tiny membrane bubbles known as vesicles or membrane tubules, such communication requires complex interplay between the lipid bilayers and cytosolic proteins such as members of the Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) superfam- ily of proteins. With rapid developments in novel experimental techniques, membrane remodeling has become a rapidly emerging new field in recent years. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are important tools for obtaining atomistic information regarding the structural and dynamic aspects of biological systems and for understanding the physics-related aspects. The availability of more sophisticated experimental data poses challenges to the theoretical community for devel- oping novel theoretical and computational techniques that can be used to better interpret the experimental results to obtain further functional insights. In this review, we summarize the general mechanisms underlying membrane remodeling con- trolled or mediated by proteins. While studies combining experiments and molecular dynamics simulations recall existing mechanistic models, concurrently, they extend the role of different BAR domain proteins during membrane remodeling pro- cesses. We review these recent findings, focusing on how multiscale molecular dynamics simulations aid in understanding the physical basis of BAR domain proteins, as a representative of membrane-remodeling proteins.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2016年第1期349-359,共11页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.21403182) the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong,China(Grant No.City U 21300014)
关键词 membrane curvature membrane remodeling protein molecular dynamics COARSE-GRAINING membrane curvature, membrane remodeling protein, molecular dynamics, coarse-graining
  • 相关文献

参考文献122

  • 1Pichot C S, Arvanitis C, Hartig S M, Jensen S A, Bechill J, Marzouk S, Yu J, Frost J A and Corey S J 2010 Cancer Res. 70 8347.
  • 2Hu J, Mukhopadhyay A and Craig A W B 2011 J. Biol. Chem. 286 2261.
  • 3Teasdale R D and Collins B M 2012 Biochem. J. 441 39.
  • 4Roth T F, Roth T F, Porter K R and Porter K R 1964 J. Cell Biol. 20 313.
  • 5Takei K, Slepnev V I, Haucke V and De Camilli P 1999 Nat. Cell Biol. 1 33.
  • 6Wendland B, Steece K E and Emr S D 1999 EMBO J. 18 4383.
  • 7Ford M G J, Mills I G, Peter B J, Vallis Y, Praefcke G J K, Evans P R and McMahon H T 2002 Nature 419 361.
  • 8Peter B J, Kent H M, Mills I G, Vallis Y, Butler P J G, Evans P R and McMahon H T 2004 Science 303 495.
  • 9Shimada A, Niwa H, Tsujita K, Suetsugu S, Nitta K, Hanawa-Suetsugu K, Akasaka R, Nishino Y, Toyama M, Chen L, Liu Z J, Wang B C, Yamamoto M, Terada T, Miyazawa A, Tanaka A, Sugano S, Shirouzu M, Nagayama K, Takenawa T and Yokoyama S 2007 Cell 129 761.
  • 10Cooke I R and Deserno M 2006 Biophys. J. 91 487.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部