期刊文献+

广州市宫颈癌患者生存质量及其影响因素分析 被引量:4

Cervical cancer patients quality of life and affecting factors analysis of Guangzhou city
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的调查广州市宫颈癌患者生存质量,分析其影响因素。方法采用中文版宫颈癌生存质量评估量表(FACT-Cx)对237名从广州市癌症登记数据库中随机抽取的女性宫颈癌患者进行调查,使用单因素分析和非条件logistic回归评估关联。结果认为获得了医生更多关注的患者总的生存质量得分更高(OR=4.65,95%CI:1.69-12.87),有更高的生理状况评分(OR=5.88,95%CI:2.17-16.06),更高的社交状况评分(OR=5.88,95%CI:2.16-16.05),更高的情感状况评分(OR=4.77,95%CI:1.93-11.89),更高的功能状况评分(OR=5.26,95%CI:1.91-14.53)。知道全部或大部分病情的患者相比不知道病情的患者的生存质量评分更高(OR=2.36,95%CI:1.05-5.34)。结论医患关系,主要是医生的态度,而不是患者的参与,是宫颈癌患者生存质量的重要影响因素。有效的干预需要建立良好的医患关系。 Objective To evaluate the quality of life( QOL) among cervical cancer patients and explore its affecting factors. Methods With Chinese version FACT-Cx Questionnaire,the quality of life was evaluated on 237 women cervical cancer patients randomly selected from Guangzhou cancer registries database by sampling method,non-conditional logistic regression method wag used to choice the main affecting factors. Results Patients who gained more attention from doctors have higher FACT-Cx scores( OR = 4. 65,95% CI: 1. 69 -12. 87),higher psychological status scores( OR = 5. 88,95% CI: 2. 17 - 16. 06),higher social well-being scores( OR = 5. 88,95% CI: 2. 16 - 16. 05),higher emotional well-being scores( OR = 4. 77,95% CI:1. 93 - 11. 89),higher social functional well-being scores( OR = 5. 26,95% CI: 1. 91 - 14. 53) compared to the patients who gained less attention from the doctor. Quality of life scores of patients who know all of or most of the illness are higher than those who don't know the illness( OR =2. 36,95% CI: 1. 05 -5. 34). Conclusions Doctor-patient relationship,especially doctors' attitude,had significant association with the QOL of cervical cancer survivors,but not the patients' participation. Effective intervention need to carry out for the development of doctor-patient relationship.
出处 《医学动物防制》 2016年第1期15-18,共4页 Journal of Medical Pest Control
基金 广东省医学科研基金项目(A2012528)
关键词 宫颈癌 生存质量 影响因素 Cervical cancer Quality of life Affecting factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1肖水源.《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J].临床精神医学杂志,1994,4(2):98-100. 被引量:4093
  • 2彭金莲,王增英,韦若梨,卢惠珍,詹凤球.社会支持对晚期癌症家居宁养患者生活质量的影响[J].中国实用护理杂志,2005,21(5):5-6. 被引量:39
  • 3何小梅,李卉,黄霜,王小芹,张芹.乳腺癌患者生存质量的影响因素分析[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2005,27(9):552-555. 被引量:25
  • 4(美)威廉.科克汉姆 杨辉等(译).医学社会学[M].北京:华夏出版社,2000,1.205.
  • 5Johnson JR,Temple R.Food and Drug Administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs [J].Cancer Treat Rep,1985,69(10):1155-1159.
  • 6Celia DE,Tulsky DS,Gray G,et al.The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale:development and validation of the general measure [J].J Clin Onco1,1993,11(3):570-579.
  • 7Bray F, Parkin DM, Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: Principles and methods. Part I : Comparability, validity and timeliness [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(5): 747-755.
  • 8Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR et al. Cancer incidence in five conti- nents, Vol. IX. IARC scientific publications No. 160[M]. Lyon: IARC, 2007.
  • 9Parkin DM, Chen VW, Ferlay J, et al. Comparability and quality control in cancer registration. IAtlC technical report No.19[M]. Lyon: IARC. 1994.
  • 10Felay J, Burkhard C, Whelan S, et al. Check and conversion programs for cancer registries. IARC technical report No.42[M]. Lyon: IARC, 2005.

共引文献772

同被引文献28

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部