行政裁量怠惰及控制研究——以“醉驾”专项整治行动为例

The Research of Discretion Idleness and Judicial Review with the Drunken Driving as an Example

一直以来各类专项整治行动数见不鲜,但学界对于此类运动式执法的定性研究并不多,将其与行政裁量怠惰联系的理论研究亦少见,法律规定与司法审查也存在不足。本文以"醉驾"专项整治行动为例,欲从比较法角度归纳出裁量怠惰的含义,进一步区分与其相似的概念,从而尝试探讨裁量怠惰的构成要件。结合对裁量怠惰的评价与瑕疵后果的分析,从司法层面对裁量怠惰行为进行判定,提出相关"红头文件"的处理方式,针对行政决定是否执行分别适用变更判决与撤销判决。

Althongh various special rectifications have been mplemented,the academic researches of such campcan-style low enforement are small in number. and soare therotical stvdies of the relootion betwen it and the thery of dscetion idleness. Legal provisions as well as judicial review are insufficient,too. This article,with the drunken driving as an example,lhtends to generalize the meaning of discretion idleness in the vision of comparative law,to further distinguish the similar concepts,and tries to explore the constitutive requirements of discretion idleness. Combining with the evaluation and defective consequence analysis of it,judge the discretion idleness action,handle the "red head file"and annul or amend by judgment in the judicial way whether the administrative decision is executive.