摘要
我国2012年《刑事诉讼法》首次确认未成年人附条件不起诉制度,但是适用范围过窄,限制了附条件不起诉制度在刑事诉讼程序中的功能性作用。大陆法系的德国基于便宜主义原则而适用的未限定行为主体的"附条件不起诉"制度是司法上的理智选择,体现了诉讼经济理念,其司法实践的具体数据为我国刑事审前分流机制的改革提供了范本。附条件不起诉作为刑事案件"去犯罪化"的策略之一,适应现代刑罚目的观转变的需要,也符合现代刑事司法的发展趋势,它创造法律秩序下的和平并且使被指控人再社会化成为可能。
In 2012 the criminal procedure Law confirmed for the first time the conditional non-prosecution system in the Minors’case in China,which the scope of application is too narrow.This system limited the functional role of the conditional non-prosecution system in the criminal procedure Law.In Germany,the civil law system,the conditional non-prosecution system,which is based on the principle of cheap doctrine,is a judicial choice.The conditional non-prosecution system embodied the concept of litigation economy and its specific data in the judicial practice can provide us a model for the reform in the pre-trial diversion mechanism in China.As one of the strategies'to eliminate the criminalization'in criminal cases,it adapts to the need of changing for the modern penalty’s purpose,and conforms to the trend of the modern criminal justice’s development,which creates peace under the legal orders and makes the accused person re-socialization possible.
出处
《比较法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期177-187,共11页
Journal of Comparative Law
基金
天津市2016年度哲学社会科学规划一般项目"刑事速裁程序的域外经验与中国探索--以速裁程序在天津的试点为参考"(项目批准号:TJFX16-006)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
附条件不起诉
便宜主义原则
起诉裁量
诉讼经济
刑事审前分流
conditional non-prosecution
opportunity principle
prosecutorial discretion
litigation economy
criminal pre-trial diversion