期刊文献+

美国州级学前教育治理结构最新战略调整及其反思 被引量:4

Reorganizations of Governance Structures at State-Funded Early Childhood Education in the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 21世纪初颁布的《不让一个孩子掉队法案》推动美国各州进一步普及学前教育,并促使越来越多的州级政府开始为学前教育项目提供公共经费。基于政府的问责要求,调整学前教育治理结构对于州政府来说势在必行。根据相关文献以及二次数据分析,介绍了州级学前教育治理结构调整的背景,然后深入剖析了三种主要的治理模式:保守派的协同式治理、中间派的合并式治理以及激进派的新建式治理。各州内部治理的主权归各州以及地方政府机构,因此地方在选择治理结构时会受到已有的制度路径和制度传统的影响,后续的发展还需静观其变。 The issue of universal pre-kindergarten(UPK)education has been increasingly a concern within school districts,private and public corporations,state and federal legislators.The paper aims to investigate the new trends of governance structures in the state-funded early childhood education(ECE)from the perspective of universal pre-kindergarten education.Universal Pre-K programs vary from state to state in terms of methodology,availability,eligibility,and execution.Three main modes are fully discussed with example states as follow:collaborative governance,consolidated governance,and creation of a new agency governance,which are highly different in terms of process and structure.Then the paper further explores the reasons behind the different governance modes in three example states,and informs its further implications for universal preschool policy in the United States.
作者 李敏谊 李青颖 林学婷 LI Minyi;LI Qingying;LIN Xueting(Faculty of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875Faculty of Education,The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong 999077)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第5期83-90,共8页 International and Comparative Education
基金 2016年度国家社会科学基金教育学重点课题"学前教育中长期发展目标及推进策略研究"(项目编号:AHA160008)阶段性研究成果之一
关键词 普及学前教育 学前教育治理 治理结构 universal pre-K governance ECE governance governance structure
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1范明丽.我国学前教育管理体制改革的方向与制度设计一一基于政府治理模式转型的研宄[D].北京师范大学,2014. 1, 104.
  • 2Kagan, S. L. & Cohen, N. E. Reinventing earlycare and education: A vision for a qualitysystem[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1996:5.
  • 3Moss, P. What is our image of the child.Critical questions in early childhood policy,provision and practice[R]. Symposium on EarlyLearning. Toronto: Ryerson University, 2011.
  • 4Friendly, M. Early childhood educationand care in Toronto: Funding the Future[R].Childcare Resource and Research Unit, 2012:30.
  • 5Hustedt,T. & Barnett W. S. Financingearly childhood education programs: State,federal, and local issues[J]. EducationalPolicy, 2011,25(1) : 167-192.
  • 6Kagan, S. L. & Kauerz, K. “Early childhoodsystems: Looking deep, wide, and far,[A] InKagan, S. L.,Kauerz, K. (Eds). Early childhoodsystems: Transforming early learning[M]. NewYork: Teachers College Press, 2012: 25, 5.
  • 7Gomez, R. E. Exploring thepotential of consolidated approaches togovernance for bringing coherence to earlychildhood education systems [D]. Teacherscollege, Columbia University, 2014: AppendixJ, 46, 124-125, 48.
  • 8Goffin, S. G. Martella,J. & Coffman, J. Visionto Practice: Setting a New Course for EarlyChildhood Governance[R]. Washington, DC:Goffin Strategy Group.2001: 4.
  • 9Administration for Children andFamily. Early Childhood State AdvisoryCouncils Final Report 2015 [EB/OL]. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ecd/sac_2015_final_report. pdf.[访问时间 2015-10-201.
  • 10NCA Centers for Best Practice. Creating aComprehensive State Early Childhood AdvisoryCouncil [EB/OL]. http://www. nga. org/files/1 ive/sites/NGA/f i 1 es/pdf/0905ECACFAQ. PDF.[访问时间 2016-01-201.

共引文献1

同被引文献27

引证文献4

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部