期刊文献+

面向影响分析的电力通信网故障定位算法 被引量:7

Algorithm of Fault Locating on Impact Analysis in Power Communications Network
原文传递
导出
摘要 由于电力通信网络具有极高可用性和风险规避的特点,使传统通信网在关注故障影响程度上有很大不同.针对遗漏通信网络故障可能导致电力事故的问题,提出了可信参数最小损失故障定位算法.算法基于加权概率二分图模型,在分析故障对症状的覆盖和贡献的基础上,重点考虑遗漏故障所造成影响,通过加入可信参数来优先选择给定影响度之上的假设故障集.仿真实验表明,最小损失故障定位算法能够在有效考虑删除故障可能影响的同时,兼顾对已观察症状的合理解释,在不增加算法复杂度的情况下,相对其他算法有较小的误判率和较短的算法平均运行时间,可以更好地适应于电力通信网络中的故障定位. Because the extremely high availability and the characteristics of risk aversion are demanded in electric power communication network,there is great difference between the electric power communication network and conventional communication networks. The minimum loss of credible parameter( MLCP) algorithm has been proposed for the problem that the missing faults can lead to the possibility of power accident. Briefly reviewing and summarizing the symptom of coverage and contribution in classic algorithm, the impact of the fault loss is put more attention to,which is of advantage in power communication network and add the credible parameter to select the hypothesis fault firstly. Simulations show that MLCP algorithm can make the reasonable explanation for the observed symptoms with smaller false positive rate( FPR) and averaging running time of algorithm than other algorithms,without increasing the complexity of the algorithm. The MLCP algorithm is more appropriate to the fault location in the electric power communication network.
出处 《北京邮电大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第S1期55-59,共5页 Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2012AA050801)
关键词 电力通信网 网络管理 故障定位 electric power communication network fault location network management
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Steinder M and Sethi A S. The present and future of event correlation: A need for end-to-end service fault localization [C]. Proc. World Multi-Conf. Systemic, Cybernetics, and Informatics (SCI), Orlando, FL, 2001: 124-129.
  • 2Steinder M and Sethi A S. A survey of fault localization techniques in computer networks [J]. Science of Computer Programming, 2004, 53(2): 165-194.
  • 3Mas C and Thiran P. A review on fault location methods and their application to optical networks [J]. Optical Networks Magazine, 2001, 2(4): 73-87.
  • 4Mas C and Thiran P. An efficient algorithm for locating soft and hard failures in WDM networks [J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2000, 18(10): 1900-1911.
  • 5Zhao Y, Chen Y, and Bindel D. Towards unbiased end-to-end network diagnosis [C]. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2006 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures and Protocols for Computer Communications, Pisa, Italy, 2006: 219-230.
  • 6Katzela I and Schwartz M. Schemes for fault identification in communication networks [J]. IEEE/ A CM Trans. on Networking, 1995, 3(6): 733-764.
  • 7Yemini S and Kliger S. A coding approach to event correlation, integrated network management [C]. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, Santa Barbara, California, USA, 1995 266-277.
  • 8Steinder M and Sethi A S. End-to-end service failure diagnosis using belief networks [C]. Proc. Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), Florence, Italy, 2002: 375-390.
  • 9Steinder M and Sethi A S. Probabilistic fault localization in communication systems using belief networks [J]. IEEE/ ACM Trans. on Networking, 2004, 12(5): 809-822.
  • 10Huang Xiao-hui, Zou Shi-hong, Wang Wen-dong, and Cheng Shi-duan. Fault management for Internet service: Modeling and algorithms [C]. IEEE International Conference on Communications, Istanbul, Turkey, June 2006, 2: 854-859.

共引文献9

同被引文献66

引证文献7

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部