期刊文献+

设计师和用户的汽车造型意象认知差异研究 被引量:27

Imagery Cognition Differences between Designers and Users Automobile Modeling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究汽车造型设计领域中设计师和用户的意象认知的差别。方法通过访谈和语义分析的方式定义了设计师和用户的意象认知对象,并且描述了两者的认知差别。在心理学中双重编码的理论基础上提出了汽车造型的意向认知由形态认知和语义认知组成,调研了50名用户对16款汽车造型的审美评价和20名设计师对设计案例的描述,并采用语义抽取的方法获得了673个语义词。对比设计师和用户在语义词选择上的差别以及分析语义词所对应的形态特征。结果设计师与用户的语义认知差异主要集中在场景层,语义与形态特征呈现多维的映射关系,场景层语义主要映射汽车形面特征认知。结论场景层语义映射的形面认知是汽车设计师和用户的认知差异所在。 It aims to study the differences of imagery cognition between designers and users in the domain of automobile modeling design. The duel-coding theory from psychology is introduced to the domain of automobile modeling that the image cognition is constructed by semantics and form features sub-system. Two surveys on designer′s design intention expressions and users′aesthetic in term of automobile modeling are taken. The semantics and form features are captured and analyzed through structured hierarchy,and then the mapping between semantics and form features is build through cognitive experiments. The semantic cognitive difference between designers and users is mainly focused on the scene layer;the mapping mode between semantics and form features is multidimensional;the semantics on the scene layer are mainly mapping with the treatment features. The mapping cognition between treatment and semantics in scene layer is the mainly difference of imagery cognition between designers and users in the domain of automobile design.
出处 《包装工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第24期33-36,共4页 Packaging Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61402159) 湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX2014B158) 湖南省科技计划(2014GK3135) 湖南省自然科学基金(2015JJ4015)
关键词 汽车造型 意象认知 语义 形态特征 认知差异 automobile modeling imagery cognition semantics form features cognitive differences
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1KRIPPENDORFF K.The Semanlic Turn, A New Foundalion tor Design[M].New Yolk : CRC Press, 2005.
  • 2LIN R, WONG J.Application of Multidimensional Scaling in Product Semantics[J].Internalional Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1996( 18 ) : 193-204.
  • 3PAIVIO A.Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach [M].New York:Oxford University Press, 1986.
  • 4CHEN K, CHARLES L.Form Language and Style Description [J].Design Studies, 1997,18(3) :249-274.
  • 5赵丹华,赵江洪.汽车造型特征与特征线[J].包装工程,2007,28(3):115-117. 被引量:85
  • 6梁峭,赵江洪.汽车造型特征与特征面[J].装饰,2013(11):87-88. 被引量:19
  • 7王贞,谭征宇.基于整体性认知的汽车造型特征研究[J].包装工程,2013,34(24):51-54. 被引量:17
  • 8CATALANO C, GIANNINI F, MONTI M.Towards an Auto- matic Semanlic Annotation of Car Aesthelies[J].Artificial In- telligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufactur- ing, 2007( 1 ) :73-90.
  • 9兰盖克.认知的语法基础[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
  • 10CARROLL J, BRISCOE E, GROVER C.Development Envi- ronment for Large Natural l,anguage Grammars[M].Cam- bridge : Cambridge University, 1991.

二级参考文献26

  • 1宋业存.产品设计中的形态相关性研究[J].包装工程,2004,25(5):90-92. 被引量:10
  • 2杨帆,叶潇,曹存根,邵志清.基于场合和角色的情绪知识获取与分析[J].计算机工程,2006,32(15):197-199. 被引量:3
  • 3赵丹华,赵江洪.汽车造型特征与特征线[J].包装工程,2007,28(3):115-117. 被引量:85
  • 4张文泉,赵江洪.奥迪品牌造型基因研究[J].包装工程,2007,28(4):84-86. 被引量:28
  • 5兰盖克.认知语法基础[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
  • 6造型面特征分析-计算机辅助工业设计(CAID)中特征造型技术研究[D].北京:北京理工大学,2001
  • 7PHILIPSON M.Aestheties Today[M].USA: Word Publishing Press, 1961.
  • 8EVES B, HEWITF J.Style-branding, Aesthetic Design DNA [C]//International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education 10 & 11 September 2009, University of Brighton, 2009.
  • 9LEIBE B, ETI'LIN A, SCHIELE B.Learning Semantic Object Parts for Object Categorization[J].Image and Vision Comput- ing, 2008,26 : 15-26.
  • 10AHMAD S, CHASE S C.Style Representation in Design Gram- mars[J].Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2012,39 : 486-500.

共引文献134

同被引文献234

引证文献27

二级引证文献164

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部