政治经济学被颠覆了吗?

Has Political Economics Been Overturned?

针对有关政治经济学的误读,文章讨论了三个问题:(1)"劳动价值论无法解释价值总量变化"的观点,早就遭到了马克思的驳斥。马克思指出的问题,不仅当年的李嘉图"完全没有注意到",而且今天的现代经济学也"完全没有注意到"。(2)即便按"风险报酬"的逻辑来展开讨论,也根本动摇不了剩余价值论的基础。价值判断和道德判断不是剩余价值论的任务,历史判断和事实判断才是剩余价值论的使命。(3)马克思主义政治经济学从来不讳言其阶级性,这并不等于说,马克思主义不能做出客观的事实判断。历史评价与道德评价相统一,事实判断与价值判断相统一,这就是马克思主义政治经济学的科学性与阶级性相统一的最好体现。

On account of misunderstanding of political economics,this paper discusses three issues. First,the viewpoint of ＂ labor theory of value＇s inexplainability of the change of gross value＂ has been disproved for a long time. The problem proposed by Marx has not been paid attention to by Ricardo and current modern economics. Second,even the discussion is opened up according to the logic of ＂ risk premium＂,the foundation of theory of surplus value cannot be shaken. Value judgment and moral judgment are not the task of theory of surplus value,but historical judgment and fact judgment are the mission of theory of surplus value. Third,Marxist political economics has never avoided mentioning its class nature,however,it does not mean that Marxism cannot make objective factual judgments. The unity of historical evaluation and moral evaluation,and fact judgment and value judgment are the best embodiment of the unity of scientificity and class nature of Marxist political economics.