期刊文献+

庭审中心主义视域下的检察制度改革 被引量:10

Reform of Procuratorial System in the Perspective of Tribunal Judicial Centralism
原文传递
导出
摘要 庭审中心主义意味着审判案件以庭审为中心,事实证据调查在法庭,定罪量刑辩论在法庭,以改变以往卷宗复制主义带来的诉讼结构偏失,全面落实直接言词原则与严格执行非法证据排除。立足于庭审中心主义诉讼模式,检察权应当坚守"法律的守护人"的角色定位,建构侦查权、检察权与审判权之间的功能秩序,这就要求正确处理侦诉关系、实现公诉工作的精确化和重视刑事审前程序。为此,检察制度改革需要正确处理上命下从与检察官的客观义务的关系,通过立法赋予主任检察官对案件分类管理的职权,并以契约主义为理论基础,建构我国的认罪协商制度。 Tribunal ju.dicial centralism means that the trial of Cases should take trial as the center, with the.court responsible for factual evidence investigation and the debate about conviction and sentencing being in the court, changing litigation structure deviation caused by the past file copy doctrine so as to completely carry out direct testimony principle and strictly implement the exclusion of illegal evidence. Based on the litigation mode of tribunal judicial centralism, procuratorial power should stick to the role of "legal guardian" and construct the functional order among investigation power, procuratorial power and judicial power, which demands to handle correctly the re lationship between investigation and litigation, realize the precision of public prosecUtion and stress:the pretrial procedures. Therefore, the reform procuratoriat system has to duly deal with the relationship between the obedience to the order of superior officers and the objective obligation of procurator, empower head prosecutor to conduct sort management over cases through legislation, and construct China^s plea bargaining system 'with contractualism as the theoretical foundation.
作者 姜涛 蒋国强
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期23-40,共18页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 直接言词证据原则 庭审中心主义 非法证据排除 公诉的精确化 功能秩序 客观义务 direct testimony principle tribunal judicial centralism illegal evidence exclusion the precision of prosecution functional order objective obligation
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献146

共引文献1084

引证文献10

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部