期刊文献+

实验优位还是理论优位?——哈金新实验主义思想简评 被引量:1

Theory Priority or Experiment Priority?——Comments on Hacking's New Experimentalism Thoughts
原文传递
导出
摘要 新实验主义的创始人伊恩·哈金提出"实验有自己的生命"的命题,认为实验先于理论,实验干预并创造现象,实验室科学可以自我辩护。哈金高举实验的旗帜,试图把哲学从传统的"理论优位"转向"实验优位",为科学哲学指明了新的发展方向。在协调论看来,哈金的新实验主义试图从"实验"的窗口考察科学哲学的新图景固然有益,但并不能证明实验优位,也不能否证理论优位。协调论不坚持理论优位,也反对实验优位,通过对哈金新实验主义实验优位论的批判,协调论主张理论和实验都是认识论的研究窗口,其研究结果在更深层面上可能是一种等价关系。 Ian Hacking, who is the founder of the new experimentalism, proposes the proposition of "experiment has a life of its own". He thinks that experiment is prior to theory, because it can intervene and create phenomena, and the laboratory science can defense itself. Hacking highly praises such experimental thought which transfers people 's philosophical view of the traditional "theory priority" to "experiment priority". Thus, he points out a new direction for the development of philosophy of science. According to the theory of coordination, it is beneficial that the new experimentalism of Hacking attempts to study philosophy of science from the window of "experiment", but it can not prove the "experiment priority", or cannot disprove"theory priority". The theory of coordination does not support "theory priority", but opposes "experiment priority." Based on the critics on "experiment priority" in Hacking's new experimentalism, the theory of coordination claims that theory and experiment, which may be equivalent in a deeper sense, are both the research window for epistemology.
作者 陈向群 马雷
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期20-24,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金项目"科学问题的评价指标研究"(11BZX031) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(3213005401)
关键词 新实验主义 实验 理论优位 实验优位 协调论 new experimentalism experiment theory priority experiment priority theory of coordination
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[英]卡尔·波普尔.科学发现的逻辑[M].杭州:中国美术学院出版社,2008:254.
  • 2Ian Hacking.Representing and Intervening:Introductory Top ics in the Philosophy of Natural Science[M].Cambridge Cambridge University Press,1983.
  • 3Ian Hacking.Experimentation and Scientific Realism[J]Philosophical Topics,1982,13(1):72.
  • 4Ian Hacking.Philosophers of Experiment[J].Philosophy o Science Association,1988(2):152.
  • 5[加]伊恩·哈金.实验室科学的自我辩护[C]∥皮克林,编著.作为实践和文化的科学.柯文,伊梅,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.
  • 6[加]伊恩·哈金.表征与干预:自然科学哲学主题导论[M].王巍,孟强,译.北京:科学出版社,2010:123-124.

共引文献2

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部