摘要
解释项和被解释项之间的逻辑相关、统计相关以及因果相关等语义学模型都不能揭示科学解释的内在机制。解释必须涉及语境,必须关注解释主体。范·弗拉森和阿欣斯坦等人把解释拓展为理论、事实和语境的三元关系,但因为不是基于解释者的模型,也不能摆脱解释困境。基于贝叶斯网络的解释模型介于解释模型的语义学进路和语用学进路之间,它立足于把解释的因果关系和解释者的信念相结合,把定性解释和定量解释考虑在内从而避免科学解释陷入困境。
Explanation can＇t reveal the internal structure, If we look on explanation as logical, statistical and causal relevance. We must pay attention to the context, especially the explainer. Although Bas.C.Van Fraassen and P.Achinstein thought the context into explanation, which can＇t get rid of the plight of scientific explanation. Bayesian network model is based on the model of explanation between semantic and pragmatic approach, which is based on the explanation of the subjective beliefs, the causal explanation and random process are combined together, qualitative explanation and quantitative explanation are taken into account in order to avoid the dilemma of scientific explanation.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第1期98-103,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
科学解释
概率
因果
贝叶斯网络模型
scientific explanation
probability
cause and effect
Bayesian Network Model
