期刊文献+

财政分权与收入不平等——基于面板门限回归模型的实证分析 被引量:11

Fiscal Decentralization and Income Inequality----The Empirical Analysis Based onthe Panel Model of Threshold Regression
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用财政分权组合指标和三种居民收入基尼系数,对中国式财政分权水平与收入不平等程度进行了测度,并建立面板门限回归模型实证分析了财政分权对收入不平等的影响。研究发现:无论财政分权水平是高还是低,财政分权与收入不平等始终呈现负相关关系,即财政分权水平的提升有利于减少收入不平等;财政分权与收入不平等之间的负相关关系在不同的分权区制下呈现非线性特征,且会随着分权水平的提升而下降;财政分权对收入不平等的政策效果表现为总体居民收入不平等<农村居民收入不平等<城镇居民收入不平等。 Based on the re-measure of the level of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization and income inequality by the combine index of fiscal decentralization and three Gini coefficient of residents' income, the effect of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization on the income inequality is empirically investigated by constructing the panel model of threshold regression. It comes to the results as follows. Firstly, the relationship between the fiscal decentralization and the income inequality is always negative regardless of the level of fiscal decentralization,which means that the increase in the fiscal decentralization does good to the decrease of the income inequality. Secondly,the negative correlation between the fiscal decentralization and the income inequality shows a nonlinear feature in different decentralized regions, and furthermore, the income inequality decreases with the increase of the level of decentralization. Thirdly, the policy effect of fiscal decentralization to reduce the income inequality in ascending order are the overall income inequality, the income inequality of rural residents and the income inequality of urban residents.
作者 储德银 张婷
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期12-24,共13页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"推进农业转移人口市民化:路径选择 财力保障与地方政府激励研究"(14ZDA032) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目"财政补贴 税收优惠与战略性产业创新绩效研究"(15YJCZH020) 安徽省自然科学基金"政府民生性支出的利益归宿及其形成机制研究"(1508085MG139)
关键词 财政分权 收入不平等 基尼系数 面板门限回归模型 fiscal decentralization income inequality Gini coefficient the panel model of threshold regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1高培勇.解决收入分配问题重在建机制增渠道[N].人民日报,2010-10-13.
  • 2Oates Wallace.On the evolution of fiscal federalism:theory and institutions[Jl.National Tax Journal,2008,LXI(June):313- 334.
  • 3Stigler G.The tenable range of functions of local government,in federal expenditure policy for economic growth and stability [M].Washington DC : U.S. Government Printing Office, 1957.
  • 4Musgravc R.The theory of public finance : a study in public economy [M].New York:McGraw-Hill, 1959.
  • 5Oates W,Fiscal federalism[M].New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.
  • 6Tiebout C.A pure theory of local expenditures[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1956,64( 10):416-424.
  • 7Prud'homme R.The dangers of decentralization[R].The World Bank Research Observer, 1995:201-220.
  • 8McKinnon R.Market-preserving fiscal federalism in the american monetary union[M]. London: Macroeconomic Dimensions of Public Finance, 1997.
  • 9Qian Y,Weingast B.Federalism as a commitment to preserving market incentives [J].Journal of Economics Perspectives, 1997,11(4) :83-92.
  • 10Caroline A, Seiferling M.Income inequality,fiscal decentralization and transfer dependency[R]. IMF Working Paper, 2014.

二级参考文献277

共引文献979

同被引文献169

引证文献11

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部