期刊文献+

房树人测验抑郁评估计分系统信效度研究 被引量:6

An analysis on the reliability and validity of a scoring system of house-tree-person test for depression
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的构建一个适合临床应用的房树人测验抑郁评估计分系统。方法通过文献复习和专家咨询,初步确定评估条目;经预试验,初步确定抑郁评估计分系统;对216例抑郁情绪被试进行测试,验证该系统的信度和效度。结果抑郁评估计分系统由23个抑郁评估条目构成,分为5个因子,累计解释总方差的77.50%。总量表分半信度系数分别为0.87和0.88,内部一致性Alpha系数为0.81,各因子内部一致性Alpha系数为0.75~0.96(P〈0.01)。每个条目Kappa系数为0.71~0.89(P〈0.01);总量表分校标效度为0.65,各因子校标效度为0.34~0.60(P〈0.01)。总分阳性划界分为4分,与PHI抑郁亚量表阳性判断的一致性检验Kappa值为0.85(P〈0.01);各因子阳性划界分为1分。结论房树人测验抑郁评估计分系统具有良好的信度和效度,在临床上具有可操作性。 Objective To develop a quantitative scoring system for the House- Tree- Person( H- T- P) test. Methods By literature review and expert consultation,preliminary evaluation items were defined. After pilot test,the scoring system for assessing depression were defined. A total of 216 cases of patients with depressive mood disorder from the Tong De hosptial of the Zhejiang Province were tested. The reliability and validity of a scoring system of house- tree- person test for depression were analyzed. Results The scoring system of depression evaluation including 23 items and 5 factors,could explain 77. 50% of the cumulative total variance. The split- half reliability of the system was 0. 87 and 0. 88,and the internal consistency reliability of the system was 0. 81. The Kappa coefficient of each item was 0. 71- 0. 89( P 〈 0. 01).The standard validity of the scale was 0. 65,and the criterion validity of each factor was 0. 34- 0. 60( P 〈 0. 01). The critical point of positive demarcation was 4,and the critical point of positive demarcation of each factor was 1. The Kappa value of the consistency test was 0. 85 with the PHI Depression Inventory. Conclusion This study demonstrates H- T- P scoring system has acceptable validity and internal consistency.
出处 《浙江预防医学》 2016年第1期1-4,共4页 Zhejiang Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 国家中医药管理局国家重点学科建设计划(国中医药人教〔2012〕32号文件) 浙江省中医药重点学科建设计划(2012-XK-A02)
关键词 房树人测验 抑郁情绪 计分系统 H-T-P test Depression Scoring system
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1BUCK J N. The H - T - P technique: a qualitative and quantitative scoring manual [ J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1948 (4): 151-159.
  • 2CAMARA W, NATHAN J, PUENTE A. Psychological test usage in professional psychology: report to the APA practice and science directorates [M]. Washington, DC: ed. APA press, 1998.
  • 3BUCK J N. The House Tree Person Technique Revised Manual [M]. Los Angeles: CWPS, 1977.
  • 4LI C Y, CHUNG L I, HSIUNG P C, et al. A psychometric study of the Kinetic - House - Tree - Person scoring system tor people with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan [ J ]. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2014, 24 ( 1 ) : 20 -27.
  • 5蔡頠,汤永隆,吴嵩,陈真真.投射测验体系中的树木意象[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(5):782-790. 被引量:18
  • 6巩凯旋,高柏慧,刘浩,王旭梅.动力房树人测验在大学生应用的计分研究[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2015,24(1):80-83. 被引量:4
  • 7宁式颖,郑璐,李响,惠文佳.房树人测验用于评估青少年抑郁的应用研究[J].中国临床研究,2015,28(3):305-307. 被引量:6
  • 8中华医学会精神科分会.CCMD-3中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.31-91.
  • 9中国科学院心理所,普森人格评估中心.精神健康测验(PHI)问卷及手册[Z].1993:3.
  • 10孟沛欣,郑日昌.西方绘画评定的进展[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(2):100-102. 被引量:12

二级参考文献96

  • 1谢丽亚.SHTP测验[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1994,8(2):91-93. 被引量:11
  • 2谢丽亚,叶秀红.精神分裂症患者统合型“房树人绘画测验”测试结果分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1994,8(6):250-252. 被引量:14
  • 3樊蓓蓓,张春华.大学生心理健康状况研究进展[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2006,25(1):47-49. 被引量:11
  • 4王求是,项锦晶,刘建新.对自杀未遂者的儿时创伤和自我概念的访谈分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2007,21(6):407-410. 被引量:7
  • 5郑日昌 蔡永红 周益群 著.心理测量学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1999.162.
  • 6张卿华,王文英.(1997).画树投射测验法的应用研究.见第八届全国心理学学术会议文摘选集.苏州.
  • 7Abad-Alegrfa, F., & Duaso Crucbaga, M. (1980). Detecci6n de factores de personalidad en el test del arbol [The detection of personality factors in the Tree Test] [Abstract] Revista de Psiquiatria y Psicologla Medica, 14(7), 163-176.
  • 8Abad-Alegrfa, F., Gonzalez-Matilla, E, & Cornellai I Canals, J. (1984). Arboles de1 desierto. El test de1 airbol en un grupo de nifios saharauis [The trees in the desert: The Tree-Drawing Test in a group of Saharan children] [Abstract]. Comunicacion Psiquiatrica, 12, 37-48.
  • 9Aoki, K. (1980). A fundamental study of projective drawings: I. Retest reliability [Abstract]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 51(1), 9-17.
  • 10Bolin, B. J., Schneps, A., & Thorne, W. E. (1956). Further examination of the tree-scar-trauma hypothesis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12(4), 395-397.

共引文献130

同被引文献67

引证文献6

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部