期刊文献+

报人之死:张季鸾逝世的遗体政治与集体记忆 被引量:5

The Death of A Journalist:The Politics of Zhang Jilun's Dead Body and Collective Memory
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文围绕张季鸾的逝世及后续仪葬事件,讨论"烈士"报人在中国现当代社会集体记忆的塑造、共享、传承及重塑问题。被作为爱国报人悲情事件加以塑造的张季鸾的死亡及后续仪葬,难以跳脱20世纪三四十年代中国抗战历史的宏观环境。在抗战特定语境中,张季鸾逝世事件成为关涉张季鸾本人及《大公报》、新闻界、政治人物、国共两党、中外关系等各方力量的竞技场。与此同时,由新闻界及地方政府积极推动,官方高层参与的张季鸾逝世祭葬仪式,也成为公众共享与强化集体记忆的有效媒介。以此为契机,张季鸾被塑造成当时各方都能接受的爱国报人象征符号。而当代中国有关张季鸾逝世事件的集体记忆,也通过大众媒体、行业协会、地方政府、高等教育等机构进行着传承、更新和再造。 This paper focuses on the death of Zhang Jilun and his subsequent burial event to discuss the collective memory of the martyrs journalist how to be shaped, shared,inherited and reconstructed in contemporary China. In the specific context of Anti-Japanese War, the death of Zhang Jilun became an arena, all forces play in it. At the same time, Zhang Jilun's funeral ceremonies also become a channel sharing and strengthening the collective memory. On this basis, Zhang Jilun is accepted as a symbol of patriotic journalist.In contemporary China,the collective memory of Zhang Jilun's death is also being inherited, updated and reconstructed through mass media, journalists'association, local governments, and Universities.
作者 郭恩强
出处 《国际新闻界》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期67-88,共22页 Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication
基金 2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"<大公报>与中国新闻界集体记忆研究"(项目编号:13YJC860008)研究成果~~
关键词 张季鸾 葬礼仪式 遗体政治 集体记忆 Zhang Jilun,Memorial Ceremony, the Politics of Dead Body, Collective Memory
  • 相关文献

参考文献66

二级参考文献115

  • 1陈峰.这群为一个生命奔波的人[J].南风窗,2003(07S):26-28. 被引量:1
  • 2陈峰.一切发生在意料之外——孙志刚事件采访记[J].今传媒,2005,13(3):28-29. 被引量:9
  • 3敬告读者[N].人民日报,2009-07-01.
  • 4Zerubavel, E. (1996). Social memories: Steps to a sociology of the past, Qualitative Sociology, 19 (3): 283-299.
  • 5Misztel, Barbara A. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering, Maidenhead: Open University press.
  • 6Zelizer, B. (1990). Achieving jounudistic authority through narra- five, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7 (4): 366-376.
  • 7Olick, J.K. and J. Robbins (1998). Social memory studies: From "cellective memory" to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices, An- num Review of Sociology, 24: 105-36.
  • 8Connerton, Paul (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.
  • 9Schudson, M. (1997). Lives, laws, and language: Commemorative ver- sus non-commemorative forms of effective public memory. The Communica- tion Review, 2 (1): 3-17.
  • 10Schudson, M. (1992). Watergate in American Memory. New York: Basic Books.

同被引文献141

引证文献5

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部