期刊文献+

农民类型、非农就业与农业后继者培养述评 被引量:3

Review on farmer typology, non-farm employment and agricultural successors training
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从农民类型、农民的非农就业趋势以及农业后继者培养三个维度入手,对国内外相关研究成果进行归纳和总结。伴随着各国农业生产经营形式的显著改变,农民的类型也表现出逐渐向多元化衍生的趋势;农民不断地向非农就业转移是工业化进程中各国的共同经验,但因国情差别,不同国家农民非农就业的趋势性特征也表现出较强的个体差异;农业劳动者中年轻人不断减少而中老年人比例不断提高的现象在各国都比较普遍,如何培养农业后继者队伍是世界各国尤其是广大发展中国家当前所面临的共同难题。 From three dimensions of farmer typology, non-agricultural employment and cultivation of agricultural successors, we summarized and summed up many of domestic and foreign research literatures. Along with the significant change in the form of agricultural production and operation, the type of farmers also gradually show a trend towards diversification; Farmers' transfer to non-agricultural employment is a common experience in the process of industrialization, because of the difference among countries, the state of the farmers' employment trend in different countries also showed great differences; the number of young agricultural laborers is decreasing and the proportion of elderly agricultural laborers is rising, which is a common phenomenon in many countries, thus, how to cultivate agricultural successors team is one of the common problems in the world, particularly in the developing countries.
出处 《湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第6期1-6,45,共7页 Journal of Hunan Agricultural University(Social Sciences)
基金 湖南省情与决策咨询研究课题(2015ZZ056)
关键词 农民类型 非农就业 农业后继者 farmer typology non-farm employment farmer successors
  • 相关文献

参考文献52

  • 1刘纯阳.新型农民培养:一个理论分析框架[J].湖南社会科学,2008(6):113-116. 被引量:6
  • 2Van der Ploeg J D. Styles of farming: An introductory note on concepts and methodology[C]//Endogenous Regional Development in Europe H. Assen, Netherlands: VanGorcum, 1994: 7-30.
  • 3Bowler I R. Sustainable agriculture as an alternative path of farm business development[C]// Contemporary rural systems in transitions. Melksham: Redwood Press, 1992.
  • 4Valbuena D, Verburg PH, Bregt AK. A method to definea typology for agent-based analysis in regional land-use research[J]. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 2008, 128(1-2): 27-36.
  • 5Burton R J F, Wilson G A. Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualizations of agricultural agency: towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? [J]. Journal ofRuralStudies, 2006(22): 95-115.
  • 6李振英.农业落后于工业不是资本主义整个历史时期的现象[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1980,2(1):49-54. 被引量:1
  • 7European Commission . Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Putting Rural Development to Work for Jobs and Growth [Z]. Special Edition Newsletter, 2006.
  • 8Lee-Ann Sutherland. Differentiating farmers: opening the black box of private farming in post-Soviet states[J]. Agric Hum Values, 2010( 27): 259-276.
  • 9Harmu T. Vesala, Kari Mikko Vesala. Entrepreneurs and producers: Identities of Finnish farmers in 2001 and 2006. Journal of Rural Studies, 2010(26): 21-30.
  • 10Kopeva D, J Doichinova, S Davidova, et al. Rural households, incomes, and agricultural diversification in Bulgaria[M]. Oxford: Lexington Books, 2003 : 103-122.

二级参考文献111

共引文献1236

同被引文献34

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部