摘要
目的 分析D-二聚体(D-D)与APACHEⅡ评分对急诊重症监护病房(ICU)发生弥漫性小血管内凝血(DIC)患者转归的判断价值。方法 2012年3月~2013年12月我院急诊ICU发生DIC的患者86例,其中生存54例(生存组),32例死亡(死亡组),另选30例健康体检者(正常对照组)进行年龄、凝血因子凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)及凝血酶时间(TT)、D-二聚体(D-D)和纤维蛋白原(Fib)、抗凝血酶Ⅲ(AT-Ⅲ)检测、APACHEⅡ评分对照分析,论证D-D与APACHEⅡ评分能否判断急诊ICU发生DIC患者的转归。结果 年龄、凝血因子检测、APACHEⅡ评分结果显示,三组除Fib没有差异外(P〉0.05),年龄、PT、TT、APTT、AT-Ⅲ、D-D水平及DIC生存组与DIC死亡组APACHEⅡ评分均有差异(P〈0.05,P〈0.01)。DIC生存组与DIC死亡组图示显示,两组D-D水平与APACHEⅡ评分有非常显著的差异。结论 血浆D-D水平与APACHEⅡ评分能反映急诊ICU发生DIC的患者的病情好转与恶化,但本研究DD水平与APACHEⅡ评分的域值能否作为患者生存与死亡的预测值,还有待进一步加大样本的研究。
Objective To analyze the value of D - dimer ( D - D) and APACHE Ⅱ score occurred for the DIC patient outcomes in the emergency ICU. Method 54 cases of survival (survival group) and 32 patients died ( mortality group) were 86 patients with DIC from our hospital emergency ICU. Another 30 healthy subjects ( control group) were selected from healthy. Age, coagulation factor prothrombin time (PT) , activated partial thromboplastin time (AFFF) and thrombin time (TF) , D - dimer ( D - D) and fibrinogen (Fib) , antithrombin m ( AT - m ) detection, APACHE Ⅱ score were comparatively analyzed between three groups. D - D and demonstration APACHE Ⅱ score can occur as outcomes of patients with DIC In the emergency ICU. Result Age, clotting factor detection resuits showed difference in the three groups except Fib outside (P 〈 0. 05, P 〈 0. 01 ). APACHE Ⅱ scores were differences between DIC survival group and death group (P 〈0. 01 ). Icons show DD levels and APACHE Ⅱ score were a very significant difference in DIC survival group and death group. Conclusion Plasma DD levels and APACHE Ⅱ score can reflect condition improved and deterioration of DIC patients in emergency ICU, but in this study whether DD threshold level and APACHE Ⅱ score are as the predicted value of patient survival and death. This need to be further increased the study sample.
出处
《现代医院》
2015年第12期56-58,共3页
Modern Hospitals