认知隐喻对英语议论文写作的影响——基于语料库的中国EFL学习者名转动词表达的研究被引量：2

Influence of Cognitive Metaphor on English Argumentative Writing:A Corpus-based Study of Denominal Verbs Used by Chinese EFL Learners

下载PDF

导出

摘要传统的隐喻研究将隐喻仅看作一种用于修饰话语的修辞现象,而从认知语言学角度来看,隐喻还是人们认识世界的思维方式。本文基于对英语本族语者语料库和中国EFL学习者语料库的研究方法,对库中名转动词隐喻现象的使用情况进行对比研究,探究认知隐喻在词汇习得、修辞表达、意识构建、概念流利等层面起到的独特作用。希望本研究有助于中国EFL学习者在英语学习过程中,通过加强隐喻意识,达到产出地道英语的目的。 Metaphor is traditionally regarded as a kind of figure of speech by linguistics. From cognitive perspective, metaphor is also an important tool through which people get to know the world. This paper is a corpus-based study which, through comparing the frequencies of demonical verbs used by Chinese EFL learners and native English speakers, reveals the linguistic functions of cognitive metaphor on many aspects of English argumentative writing, such as vocabulary acquisition, rhetoric expressing, ideological construction and conceptual fluency attaining. EFL learners are expected to benefit from the findings of the present study and to produce native-like English through improving metaphorical awareness.

作者聂璐璐陈建生

机构地区天津科技大学

出处《中国轻工教育》 2015年第6期25-28,共4页 China Education of Light Industry

关键词认知隐喻概念隐喻学习者语料库名转动词 cognitive metaphor conceptual metaphor learners＇ corpora demonical verbs

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1Clark,E. V. When nouns surface as verbs[J].Language, 1979(4) :767-811.
2Danesi, Marcel. Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: The neglected dimension[A].In J. E. Alatis(Eds.), Language Communication and Social Meaning [C]. Washington,DC:Georgetown University Press,1992.
3Fauconnier,G. Mappings in Thought and Language[M]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1997.
4Lackoff,G. and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live by [M].Chicago:the University of Chicago Press,1980.
5Littlemore,J. Metaphoric competence :A possible language learning strength of students with a holistic cognitive style[J].TESOL Quarterly,2001(35):459-491.
6Quick,R. et al. A Grammar of Contemporary English [M].London : Longman, 1972.
7Richards,A. The Philosophy of Rhetoric [M].New York: Oxford University Press,1965.
8董宏乐,徐健,梁育全.外语教学中的概念流利[J].外语教学与研究,2003,35(2):140-144. 被引量：106
9高芳,徐盛桓.名动转用语用推理的认知策略[J].外语与外语教学,2000(4):13-16. 被引量：56
10刘正光.名词动用过程中的隐喻思维[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(5):335-339. 被引量：113

二级参考文献19

1蒋严.语用推理与“都”的句法/语义特征[J].现代外语,1998,21(1). 被引量：116
2高芳,徐盛桓.名动转用与语用推理[J].外国语,2000,23(2):7-14. 被引量：69
3徐盛桓.常规关系与认知化——再论常规关系[J].外国语,2002,25(1):6-16. 被引量：146
4黄国文.以结果为中心到以过程为中心[A].外语名家论要[C].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,1999.
5Danesi, M. 2000. Semiotics in Language Education [M]. Berlin, New York:Mouton de Bruyter.
6Halliday, M. A. K. 1987. Study Writing[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7Halliday, M. A. K. 1990. New ways of meaning: A challenge to applied linguistics[J]. Journal of Applied Linguistics 6.
8Halliday, M.A.K. 1995. Language and the reshaping of human experience[A]. In B. Dendmos ( ed. ).Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Critical Discourse Analysis [C]. Athens: University of Athens Press.
9Halliday, M.A.K. & C, Matthiessen. 2000. Construing Experience through Meaning : A Language-based Approach to Cognition [M]. London: Cassell.
10Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence[A].In Brumfit, C. & K. Johnson (els.). The communicative Approach to Language Teaching[C].Oxford: OUP. Pp. 5-24.