期刊文献+

表现修辞的二重性——从《镕裁》篇考证《文心雕龙》的写作意图 被引量:1

The Duality of Expressive Rhetoric: The Intention of Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon as Investigated from“Casting and Paring”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 首先,本文在《文心雕龙》整体阅读的基础上,建立起《镕裁》与其他篇目的有机联系,我们才能逐渐领会和把握刘勰传授中国文化表现修辞的结构特质、文化效能和儒家伦理责任。其次,鉴于《情采》和《镕裁》两者在论证模式上的平行性,我们可以归纳出以"情"为主体性和以"辞"为文本性因素所构成的修辞的一体两面。它在《原道》《征圣》和《宗经》中得到了创世模式意义上"镕裁"(论证和书写)。因此,《文心雕龙》的写作意图在理论论证方面表现为:修辞是一个不自然的生成模式,由于内在化而与自然发生了分离,故修辞表现为善与恶的二重性;其书写法式体现为:在刘勰看来,或者刘勰的骈文写作本身暗示,中国文化所特有的"表现修辞"的功能在于,以征引经典文本方式使修辞突破其自身的限制,同时指引读者突破自身生存的限制,召唤读者充分参与超越性的儒教理念以及充分变更生命的能力。 On the basis of a global reading of Liu Xie's Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon,this paper proposes a link between the section"Casting and Paring"and the other sections in the book,and maintains that only through such a link can the structural features, cultural efficiency and Confucian responsibilities in Liu Xie's expressive rhetoric. The parallelism in argumentative mode between the section "Affections and Coloration"and the section "casting and paring"informs a two-sided rhetoric with affection as the subjective quality and casting as the textual quality. "Casting and paring"( argumentation and writing) is realized as a primary mode in the sections of "The Source in the Way,""Learning the Sages"and "Revering the Classics. "Therefore,the intention of writing Literary Mind shows in its argumentation. First,rhetoric is an unnatural generating mode,and it shows a nature of duality of good and evil because its internalization separates itself from nature. Secondly,Liu Xie's writing mode shows that the unique function of expressive rhetoric suggested by his writing practice of parallel prose lies in both the breakthroughs in rhetoric by way of alluding to classical texts and in the reader's existential experience by way of calling the readers to participate in the transcendental Confucian ideals to change their lives.
作者 李包靖
出处 《文艺理论研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期110-120,共11页 Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
关键词 体性 《镕裁》 修辞的二重性 表现修辞 nature and form casting and paring the duality of rhetoric expressive rhetoric
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1范文澜.《文心雕龙注》,北京:人民文学出版社,1958年.
  • 2Fan,Wenlan.Annotations to The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon.Beijing:People's Literature Publishing House,1958.
  • 3林田慎之助“《文心雕龙》文学原理论的若干问题”彭恩华译,《日本研究<文心雕龙>论文集》,王元化编选,济南:齐鲁书社,1983年.
  • 4Hayashida,Shinnosuke."Questions of Literary Theory in The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon."Trans.Peng Enhua.Essays on The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon from Japanese Scholars.Ed.Wang Yuanhua.Jinan:Qilu Publishing House,1983.
  • 5阿尔伯特·赫希曼.《欲望与利益》,冯克利译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2015年.
  • 6Hirschman,A.O.The Passions and the Interests.Trans.Feng Keli.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press,2015.
  • 7黄侃《<文心雕龙>札记》.北京:中华书局2006年.
  • 8Huang,Kan.Notes on The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon.Beijing:Zhonghua Book Company,2006.
  • 9兴膳宏“《文心雕龙》与《诗品》在文学观上的对立”,彭恩华译,《日本研究<文心雕龙>论文集》,王元化编选.济南:齐鲁书社,1983年.
  • 10Kozen,Hiroshi."Opposition in Literary Concept between The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon and Twenty-Four Styles of Poetry."Trans.Peng Enhua.Essays on The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragon from Japanese Scholars.Ed.Wang Yuanhua.Jinan:Qilu Publishing House,1983.

共引文献42

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部