期刊文献+

基于IRT的决策一致性系数在大规模教育测量中的应用 被引量:4

Analyzing classification consistency indices in large-scale assessment based on item response theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在一个大规模教育测量中,以小学四年级和初中二年级的数学测验为例,使用基于项目反应理论(item response theory,IRT)的测验决策一致性系数作为评价测验信度的标准之一,并比较在测验中选取不同分界分数、分数量尺时决策一致性系数的差异.结果发现:相比经典测验理论(classical test theory,CTT)下的信度系数,基于IRT下的测验整体信度要高于CTT下的信度;划定的分界分数(cut score)个数越少,决策一致性系数越大;分界分数位置会影响决策一致性系数,能力水平在分界分数附近的考生更容易被划分到不同类别中;将测验原始分数转换成量表分数后,多个原始分数对应一个转换分数的规则会增大决策一致性系数. Two real data sets of a large-scale educational assessment program were used to investigate classification consistency indices and to explore pivotal index-influencing factors.It was found that the overall reliability based on IRT was higher than when based on CTT.With decreasing number of cut score and manyto-one transformation rule,classification consistency indices were higher than under other conditions.In the future,it will be useful to apply IRT method and classification consistency indices to the actual educational measurement.
出处 《北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期643-648,共6页 Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(31371047) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关基金资助项目(12JZD040)
关键词 决策一致性系数 项目反应理论 分界分数 分数量尺 classification consistency indices item response theory cut score score scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献111

  • 1梁永霞,杨中楷,刘则渊.基于CiteSpaceⅡ的航空航天工程前沿研究[J].科学学研究,2008,26(S2):303-312. 被引量:21
  • 2赵世明.资格认证测验的分类一致性信度估计[J].中国考试,2006(10):30-34. 被引量:4
  • 3AERA, APA, & NCME ( 1999 ). Standards for educational and psycho- logical testing. Washington, DC : Author. 35 - 36.
  • 4Brennan, R.L. (2003). Coefficients and indices in generalizability theo- ry(CASMA Research Report No. 1). Iowa City, IA: Center for Ad- vanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The University of lo4 wa. (Available on http://www, education, uiowa, edu/easma).
  • 5Brennan, R. L. , & Wan, L. ( 2004 ). A bootstrap procedure for estima- ting decision consistency for single-administration complex assessments (CASMA Research Report No. 17). Iowa City, IA: Center for Ad- vanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The University of Io- wa. (Available on http://www, education, uiowa, edn/casma).
  • 6Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont in USA : Thomson Learning Academic Re- source Center, 192 - 211.
  • 7Hanson, B. A. ,& Brennan, R. L. (1990). An investigation of classifi- cation consistency indexes estimated under alternative strong true score models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27 (4) ,345 - 359.
  • 8Lee, W. C. , et al. (2002). Estimating consistency and accuracy indi- ces for multiple classifications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26 (4),412-432.
  • 9Lee, W. C. ( 2005 ). Classification consistency under the compound multt] nomial model( CASMA Research Report No, 13). Iowa City, IA: Ce~ ter for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The Unive1 sity of Iowa. (Available on http://www, education, uiowa, edu/casI ma). /.
  • 10Lee, W. C. (2005a). Classification consistency and accuracy for com- plex assessments using item response theory ( CASMA Research Report No. 27). Iowa City, IA : Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The University of Iowa. (Available on http://www. education, uiowa, edu/casma).

共引文献55

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部