期刊文献+

术后放疗对局部晚期伴微乳头型肺腺癌的预后价值 被引量:2

Prognostic value of postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma with micropapillary pattern
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨术后放疗对局部晚期伴微乳头型肺腺癌(MPPAC)预后的影响.方法 回顾性分析天津医科大学肿瘤医院2012年1月至2014年12月根治性切除术后,经病理诊断为MPPAC的45例PN2-3期患者临床资料.根据术后是否行放射治疗分为放疗组和未放疗组.比较两组患者的一般情况及总生存和无病生存情况.结果 全组患者的中位总生存期(overall survival, OS)为19.8个月,1年及2年总生存率分别为79.4%和30.3%.全组患者的中位无进展生存期(disease free survival,DFS)为13个月,1年及2年无进展生存率分别为59.3%和28.9%.放疗组和未放疗组患者的中位OS分别为22.3和13.4个月(χ^2=13.329,P<0.05),中位DFS分别为16.2和10.4个月(χ^2=7.972,P<0.05).全组患者表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)基因突变率57.14% (20/35).亚组分析发现,对于EGFR突变患者,放疗组和未放疗组中位OS分别为25.6和18.4个月(χ^2 =9.268,P<0.05),中位DFS分别为21.6和12.6个月(P>0.05);对于无EGFR突变的患者,放疗组和未放疗组中位OS分别为21.8和10.6个月(χ^2=9.595,P<0.05),中位DFS分别为15.2和6.6个月(χ^2=4.538,P<0.05).结论 PORT能够改善根治术后pN2.3期MPPAC患者生存,局部晚期根治术后的MPPAC患者仍需PORT. Objective To investigate the prognostic significance of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for locally advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma with micropapillary pattern(MPPAC).Methods A total of 45 completely resected pN2-3 cases that occured from January 2012 to December 2014 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.All of them were diagnosed with MPPAC by pathological diagnosis.Based on whether receiving PORT, patients were divided into radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups.General characteristics, overall survival and disease-free survival characteristics of the two groups were compared, respectively.Results The median overall survival (OS) of patients was 19.8 months, 1-year and 2-year overall survival rate was 79.4% and 30.3% , respectively.The median disease free survival (DFS) of patients was 13 months, 1-year and 2-year, and the disease free survival rate was 59.3% and 28.9% , respectively.The radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups exhibited median OS of 22.3 and 11.4 months,respectively (χ^2=13.329, P〈 0.05) , and corresponding D FS of 16.2 and 10.4 months(χ^2 =7.972 ,P 〈0.05).The epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation rate of patients was 57.14% (20/35), In the subgroup analysis, for patients with EGFR mutation, the radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups showed median OS of 25.6 and 18.4 months, respectively(χ^2 =9.268,P 〈 0.05) , and corresponding DFS of 21.6 and 12.6 months (P 〉 0.05).For patients with wildtype EGFR, the radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups showed median OS of 21.8 and 10.6 months,respectively(χ^2 =9.595,P 〈 0.05) , and corresponding DFS of 15.2 and 6.6 months(χ^2 =4.538,P 〈0.05).Conclusions PORT could improve survival of patients with pN2.3 MPPAC.For patients with locally advanced MPPAC after curative resection, PORT is still an integral part of treatment.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第12期910-915,共6页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
基金 国家自然科学基金(81372518) 天津市抗癌重大专项攻关计划项目(12ZCDZSY15900)
关键词 非小细胞肺癌 微乳头 放射治疗 预后 Non-small cell lung cancer Micropapillary Radiotherapy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Amin MB, Tamboli P, Merchant SH, et al. Micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma: a distinctive histologic feature with possible prognostic significance [ J ]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2002,26 ( 3 ) : 358-364.
  • 2Tsutsumida H, Nomoto M, Goto M, et al. A micropapillary pattern is predictive of a poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma, and reduced surfactant apoprotein A expression in the micropapillary pattern is an excellent indicator of a poor prognosis I J]. Mod Pathol, 2007,20(6):638-647.
  • 3Miyoshi T, Satoh Y, Okumura S, et al. Early-stage lung adenocarcinomas with a micropapillary pattern, a distinct pathologic marker for a significantly poor prognosis [ J ]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2003,27( 1 ) :101-109.
  • 4Nagano T, Ishii G, Nagai K, et al. Structural and biological properties of a papillary component generating a micropapillary component in lung adenocarcinoma [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2010,67 (3) :282-289.
  • 5Warth A, Muley T, Meister M, et al. The novel histologic International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification system of lung adenocarcinoma is a stage-lndependent predictor of survival[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2012,30(13) :1438-1446.
  • 6Yosbizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ, et al. Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinuma : prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging baser] on analysis of 514 stage I cases[ J]. Mot] Patbol, 2011,24(5) :653-664.
  • 7Yoshizawa A, Sumiyoshi S, Sonobe M, et al. Validation of theIASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification for prognosis and association with EGFR and KRAS gene mutations: analysis of 440 Japanese patients[ J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2013,8 (1) :52-61.
  • 8Tsuta K, Kawago M, Inoue E, et al. The utility of the proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma subtypes for disease prognosis and correlation of driver gene alterations [ J ]. Lung Cancer, 2013,81 (3) :371-376.
  • 9Cha MJ, Lee HY, Lee KS, et al. Micropapillary and solid subtypes of invasive lung adenocarcinoma: clinical predictors of histopathology attd outcome[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2014, 147(3) :921-928. e2.
  • 10Song Z, Zhu H, Guo Z, et al. Prognostic value of the IASLC/ ATS/ERS classification in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients-based on a hospital study in China [ J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013,39 ( 11 ) : 1262-1268.

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部