期刊文献+

教学自由的宪法保障与限制——以教学自由与言论自由的区别为视角 被引量:4

The Constitutional Guarantee and Limitation of Teaching Freedom——From the View of Discrimination of Teaching Freedom and Freedom of Speech
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过区分教学自由与言论自由可以探讨教学自由的范围与界限。教学自由是宪法确认的基本权利,它是社会基本权而非言论表达自由,是教师在教学场所传授专业知识的权利,属于非政治表达的范围。教师对专业知识和科学知识的选择和决定是教学自由的重要内容,它排除国家和社会组织的干涉,所以,教学自由被限定在专业知识领域内。教师不得在课堂教学中进行政治表达,其言论自由只能在开放式的公共领域内展开。 It discusses the extent and limitation of teaching freedom through discrimination teaching freedom from freedom of speech.Teaching freedom is the basic rights confirmed by the Constitution,but not freedom of speech;it is the right that the teachers have during teaching the professional knowledge in teaching place;also,teaching freedom is nonpolitical expression.Teachers' choices and decisions about professional and scientific knowledge are the core content of teaching freedom,and the states and social organizations cannot intervene in them,so teaching freedom is limited in the extent of professional knowledge.Teachers cannot provide political expressions in the class,the freedom of speech that teachers have is only permitted in the field of open and public places.
作者 胡婧 朱福惠
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《高等教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第12期13-20,共8页 Journal of Higher Education
关键词 教学自由 言论自由 宪法保障 专业知识 政治表达 teaching freedom freedom of speech constitutional guarantee professional knowledge political expression
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1MEYER V. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390(1923) [EB/OL]. [2015-05-21]. http://supreme, justia, corn/cases/federal/us/262/390/case, html.
  • 2左亦鲁.学术自由:谁的自由?如何自由?为什么自由?[M]//罗伯特·波斯特.民主、专业知识与学术自由——现代国家的第一修正案理论.左亦鲁,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:10,67.
  • 3SWEEZY V. New Hampshire, 354 U. S. 234 (1957) [EB/OL]. [2015-05-21], http://supreme. justia, com/cases/federal/us/354/234/case. html.
  • 4KEYISHIAN V. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York,385 U.S. 589 (1967) [EB/ OL].[2015-05-21]. http://suprerne, justia, corn/cases/federal/us/385/589/.
  • 5ADLER V. Board of Education,342 U.S. 485(1952) [EB/OL]. [2015-05-21]. http://caselaw, lp. findlaw. com/scripts/getcase, plcourt= us&vol= 342 &-in vol= 485.
  • 6沃克,D.M.牛津法律大辞典[K].邓正来,等,译.北京:光明日报出版社,1988:1421.
  • 7余宏亮,靳玉乐.教学自由的意义危机及其消解策略[J].教师教育研究,2013,25(6):13-18. 被引量:22
  • 8爱德华.希尔斯,林杰.论学术自由[J].北京大学教育评论,2005,3(1):63-72. 被引量:58
  • 9CARY V. Board of Education of Adams-Arapahoe School District, 598 F. 2d 535 (1979) [EB/OL]. [2015-05-24]. http..//openjurist, org/598/f2d/535/ cary-v- board-of-education-of-adam.
  • 10BRUBAKER V. Board of Education, 502 F. 2d 973 (1974) [EB/OL]. [2015-05-24]. http://www. leagle, com/decision/19741475502F2d973 _ 11325/ BRUBAKER% 20v. % 20BOARD% 20OF% 20ED., 20SCHOOL% 20DIST.% 20149,% 20COOK% 20CTY. , %20ILL.

二级参考文献14

共引文献417

同被引文献53

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部