期刊文献+

每搏量变异指导机械通气脓毒症休克患者容量复苏效果的探讨

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨每搏量变异指导机械通气脓毒症休克患者容量复苏效果。方法 76例脓毒症休克且行机械通气患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,各38例。观察组患者运用每搏量变异指导,对照组则采用中心静脉压监测液体复苏。观察并比较两组患者容量复苏效果。结果观察组治疗24 h后血乳酸水平与急性生理功能和慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组复苏6 h后的平均动脉压(MAP)和中心静脉血氧饱和度(Scv O2)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组ICU住院时间、机械通气时间、30 d内病死率均显著低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论每搏量变异监测能更好地指导脓毒症休克行机械通气患者的容量复苏,效果优于传统中心静脉压监测。
作者 邓莺
出处 《中国实用医药》 2015年第32期116-117,共2页 China Practical Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Michard F. Stroke volume variation: from applied physiology to improvedoutcomes. Crit Care Med, 2011, 39(2):402-403.
  • 2鲁素红,张欢.每搏量变异和中心静脉压监测对胃肠道手术患者术中输液量及预后的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2013,29(2):148-151. 被引量:7
  • 3Broch O, Renner J, Gruenewald M, et al. Variation of left ventricularoutflow tract velocity and global end-diastolic volume index reliablypredict fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients. CritCare, 2011, 32(6):256-263.
  • 4Takahashi H, Tagawa K, Suzuki T. Effect of individualized goal directedtherapy on outcome after major sugery. Masui, 2012, 61(10): 1071-1076.
  • 5冯喆,何清.每搏量变异度在预测液体治疗反应性中的应用[J].中国心血管杂志,2011,16(2):159-160. 被引量:6
  • 6LoupeC T, Nanadoumgar H, Frasca D, et al. Pleth variability indexpredicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med, 2011, 39(2):402-403.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in 1CU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest, 2002, 121: 2000 -2008.
  • 2Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Rodig G, et al. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Anaig, 2003, 96 : 1254-1257.
  • 3Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2004, 21:132-138.
  • 4Hofer CK,Muller SM, Furrer L, et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest, 2005, 128:848-854.
  • 5McGee WT. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamies using stroke volume and stroke volume variation: physiologic optimization program. J Intensive Care Med, 2009, 24:352-360.
  • 6de Wilde RB, Geerts BF, van den Berg PC, et al. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by the LiDCOplus and FloTrac-Vigileo system. Anaesthesia, 2009, 64:1004-1009.
  • 7Hofer CK,Senn A, Weibel L, et al. Assessment of stroke volume val"iation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care, 2008, 12:R82.
  • 8Biais M,Nouette-Gaulain K, Roullet S, et al. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg, 2009, 109:466- 469.
  • 9De Castro V,Goarin JP, Lhotel L, et al. Comparison of stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume respiratory variation (SVV) measured by the axillary artery pulse-contour method and by aortic Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing aortic surgery. Br J Anaesth, 2006, 97:605-610.
  • 10Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS, et al. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanieally ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med, 2003, 29:476-480.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部