期刊文献+

基于中国文化改良明尼苏达心力衰竭生存质量量表的条目筛选 被引量:42

Items Screening of Modified Minnesota Cardiac Failure Life Quality Scale Based on Chinese Culture
原文传递
导出
摘要 在明尼苏达心力衰竭生存质量量表(MLHF)21个条目的基础上,加入综合文献和小组专家选出的慢性心力衰竭(心力衰竭)相关中医特色条目16条,形成37个条目的预调查表,选择100例心力衰竭患者进行预调查。在分析总结预调查结果的基础上,再扩大范围征询专家的修订和增补意见,形成包括39个MLHF和中医特色条目的试验调查表的条目池,选择130例心力衰竭患者进行试验调查,经离散趋势法、主观评价法、相关系数法和逐步回归分析法处理,删除相关性较低的条目,初步形成包括28个条目的基于中国文化的改良明尼苏达心力衰竭生存质量量表(C-MLHF)。基于中国文化和中医理论背景,按照国际量表通用的程序化方式研制的符合中国人生活习惯的C-MLHF对我国心力衰竭患者生存质量评价具有更好的适应性。 On the basis of 21 items in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire ( MLHF), the authors added 16 items of Chinese medical characteristic related to chronic cardiac failure that been selected by comprehensive literature and experts to form pre-survey scale with 37 items and chose 100 patients with chronic cardiac failure to pre-survey. On the basis of analyzing and summarizing results of pre-survey, the authors expanded the scope to con- sult revise and supplemented opinions from experts to form item pool of test questionnaire including 39 items of MLHF and characteristic items of Chinese medicine, then chose 130 patients with chronic cardiac failure to test investigation. Processed by tendency of dispersion method, subjective assessment method, correlation coefficient method and step- wise regression analysis method, deleted items of low relevance and initially formed Modified MLHF (C-MLHF) including 28 items based on Chinese culture. The C-MLHF, accorded with the life habit of countrymen and developed based on Chinese culture and background of Chinese medicine theory and according to universal programmed way of international scale, has better adaptability to evaluate quality of life of patients with cardiac failure in China.
出处 《中医杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期22-24,31,共4页 Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 教育部“创新团队发展计划”(IRT1276)
关键词 慢性心力衰竭 生存质量 明尼苏达心力衰竭生存质量量表 chronic cardiac failure quality of life Minnesota living with Heart Failure Questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1慢性收缩性心力衰竭治疗建议[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(1):7-23. 被引量:2414
  • 2RECTOR TS, COHN JN. Assessment of patient outcome with the Minnestoa living with heart failure questionnaire: reliability and validity during randomized, double-blind, placebo-control trial of pimobendan. Pimobendan multi- center research group[J]. Am Heart J, 1992, 124(4): 1017 - 1025.
  • 3奚悦文,范维琥.明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量调查表适用性的评价[J].上海医学,2004,27(4):222-225. 被引量:168
  • 4ATLAS SJ, DEYO RA, van den ANCKER M, et al. The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: a 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis : results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis [J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976),2003,28 (16) : 1869 - 1876.
  • 5U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Depart- ment of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biolo- gics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiolog- ical Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported out- come measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims : draft guidance [J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2006,4:79.
  • 6中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2014[J].中华心血管病杂志,2014,42(2):98-122. 被引量:4662
  • 7方积乾.生存质量测定方法及应用[M].北京:北京大学医学出版社,2006.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 1994, 74: 1240-1244.
  • 2Rector T, Kubo S, Cohn J. Patient's self-assessment of their congestive heart failure. Part2: content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 1987, 3: 198-209.
  • 3Riegel B, Moser DK, Glaser D, et al. The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire: sensitivity to differences and responsiveness to intervention intensity in a clinical population.Nurs Res, 2002, 51: 209-218.
  • 4Middel B, Bouma J, de Jongste M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire(MLHF-Q). Clin Rehabil, 2001, 15: 489-500.
  • 5Ni H, Toy W, Burgess D, et al. Comparative responsiveness of Short-Form 12 and Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire in patients with heart failure. J Card Fail, 2000, 6: 83-91.
  • 6Sneed NV, Paul S, Michel Y, et al. Evaluation of 3 quality of life measurement tools in patients with chronic heart failure.Heart Lung, 200l, 30:332-340.
  • 7Smith RF, Johnson G, Ziesche S, et al. Functional capacity in heart failure : Comparison of methods for assessment and their relation to other indexes of heart failure. Circulation, 1993, 87(suppl 6): Ⅵ88-Ⅵ93.
  • 8Gorkin L, Norvell NK, Rosen RC, et al. Assessment of quality of life as observed from the baseline data of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trial quality-of life substudy.Am J Cardiol, 1993, 71: 1069-1073.
  • 9Cowley AJ, Wiens BL, Segal R, et al. Randomised comparison of losartan vs. Captopril on quality of life in elderly patients with symptomatic heart failure: the losartan heart failure ELITE quality of life substudy. Qual Life Res, 2000, 9: 377-384.
  • 10Alla F, Briancon S, Guillemin F, et al. Self-rating of quality of life provides additional prognostic information in heart failure. Insights into the EPICAL study. Eur J Heart Fail, 2002, 4:337-343.

共引文献7200

同被引文献390

引证文献42

二级引证文献223

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部