期刊文献+

ADC值鉴别诊断脑实质室管膜瘤与胶质母细胞瘤 被引量:6

Apparent diffusion coefficient value in differential diagnosis of intracerebral ependymoma and glioblastoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨DWI和ADC值对脑实质室管膜瘤和胶质母细胞瘤的诊断及鉴别诊断价值。方法收集经术后病理证实的27例脑实质室管膜瘤和34例胶质母细胞瘤患者的影像学资料。对患者行常规MR平扫、增强扫描及DWI检查,并测量肿瘤实质的平均ADC值,并进行统计学分析,采用ROC曲线评价ADC值的诊断价值。结果 15例脑实质室管膜瘤DWI呈高信号,ADC值为(0.90±0.14)×10-3 mm2/s,32例胶质母细胞瘤DWI呈明显高信号,ADC值为(0.72±0.07)×10-3 mm2/s,低于室管膜瘤,差异有统计学意义(t=6.75,P<0.001)。以ADC值0.79×10-3 mm2/s为阈值诊断脑实质室管膜瘤与胶质母细胞瘤,敏感度为85.2%,特异度为97.1%,准确率为91.8%。结论 DWI及ADC值在脑实质室管膜瘤和胶质母细胞瘤的诊断及鉴别诊断中具有重要参考价值,可提高其诊断正确率。 Objective To explore the value of DWI and ADC value in differential diagnosis of intracerebral ependymoma and glioblastoma.Methods Imaging data of 27 cases of intracerebral ependymoma and 34 cases of glioblastoma pathologically confirmed were collected.All patients underwent conventional MR scan,enhanced scan and diffusion weighted MR scan.ADC maps were reconstructed,and the ADC value was measured and compared in the solid part of tumors.The ROC curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of ADC values.Results Fifteen cases of intracerebral ependymoma showed high signal on DWI,and the ADC value was(0.90±0.14)×10-3 mm2/s.In 34 lesions of glioblastoma,obviously hyperintensity was observed in 32 patients on DWI,and the ADC value was(0.72±0.07)×10-3 mm2/s,which was significantly lower than that of intracerebral ependymoma(t=6.75,P〈0.001).When optimal cut point of ADC was 0.79×10-3 mm2/s for diagnosis of intracerebral ependymoma and glioblastoma,the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy was85.2%,97.1% and 91.8%.Conclusion DWI and ADC values can be applied as a complementary tool in the preoperative diagnosis and differential diagnosis of intracerebral ependymoma and glioblastoma,which can increase the diagnostic accuracy.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期44-47,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 2011年河南省科技厅重点攻关项目(112102310703)
关键词 脑实质室管膜瘤 胶质母细胞瘤 扩散磁共振成像 表观扩散系数 Intraeerebral ependymoma Glioblastoma Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Apparent diffusion coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Shuangshoti S, Rushing EJ, Mena H, et al. Supratentorial ex- traventricular ependymal neoplasms: A clinicopathologic study of 32 patients. Cancer, 2005,103(12):2598-2605.
  • 2Daggulli M, Onur MR, Firdolas F, et al. Role of diffusion MRIand apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in the diagnosis, staging and pathological classification of bladder tumors. Urol Int, 2011,87(3):346-352.
  • 3Louis DN, Ohqaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO elas sification of tumors of the central nervous system. Acta Neuro- pathol, 2007,114(5) :97 109.
  • 4Bulakbasi N, Guvenc I, Onguru O, et al. The added value of the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation to magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation and grading of malignant brain tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2004,28(6) :735-746.
  • 5郭军,孟郊,韩彤.脑胶质瘤磁敏感信号及表观扩散系数与病理分级的相关性研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(12):894-898. 被引量:9
  • 6Yamashita Y, Kumabe T, Hiqano S, et al. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficient is significantly correlated with cellularity in medulloblastomas. Neurol Res, 2009,31(9) :940-946.
  • 7谭欣,邱士军,冷西,沈雯,伍冬林.脑实质内室管膜瘤的MRI诊断分析[J].临床放射学杂志,2014,33(11):1630-1634. 被引量:7
  • 8Rumboldt Z, Camacho DL, Lake D, et al. Apparent dif{usion co- efficients for differentiation of cerebellar tumors in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006,27(6) :1362-1369.
  • 9李辉,陈兵,翟伟,李春花,石洋洋.瘤体实质ADC值及EDC值在颅内淋巴瘤与Ⅲ~Ⅳ级星形细胞瘤鉴别中的应用[J].临床放射学杂志,2014,33(2):171-174. 被引量:4
  • 10张海兵,李玉华,李君,曾凡勇,王永杰.扩散加权成像在小儿脑肿瘤诊断中的价值[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2010,16(3):189-192. 被引量:4

二级参考文献76

共引文献53

同被引文献59

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部