期刊文献+

大学教师最关注什么——基于“2014中国大学教师调查”的分析 被引量:12

What is the Focus of University Faculty——Based on the Text Analysis of 2014 University Faculty Survey in Chinese
原文传递
导出
摘要 对"2014中国大学教师调查"开放题回答内容的文本分析发现,中国大学教师群体的关注点主要集中在考评体系、大学行政化、工资待遇和教师素养上。目前来看,大学管理部门的行政思维妨碍了教师的自由发展;机械的考评体系使教师难以聚焦到真正的发展上;中西部地区及普通本科院校收入水平的相对偏低让教师发展缺乏保障;人事管理的急功近利倒逼教师不重视其长线发展。上述已成为妨碍大学教师全面发展的四道藩篱。 Text analysis of open questions in questionnaire on the development of Chinese university faculty indicates that Chinese university faculty pay more attention on evaluation system, university administration,working wages and faculty qualities. For now, flinty administration cogitation hinders the free development of faculty. Acrimonious appraisal system makes it difficult to focus faculty on genuine development. Faculty income,especially in Central and Western and in ordinary undergraduate colleges and universities, is relatively low, which makes the development of faculty lack of security. Profit-oriented personnel management promotes faculty do not attach importance to the long-term development. The above four barriers have become impediments to Chinese faculty development.
作者 李文平 沈红
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期97-102,共6页 China Higher Education Research
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"大学教师评价的效能研究--基于全国本科院校的调查"(项目编号:71273101)的研究成果
关键词 教师发展 大学教师 关注点 2014调查 faculty development university faculty attentions 2014 investigation
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献47

  • 1陈学军,王重鸣.内隐绩效模型对绩效评估一致性的效应分析[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):212-214. 被引量:8
  • 2周浩,龙立荣.绩效考核中宽大效应的成因及控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(6):806-813. 被引量:14
  • 3潘绥铭,黄盈盈.“主体建构”:性社会学研究视角的革命及本土发展空间[J].社会学研究,2007(3):174-193. 被引量:59
  • 4Boswell W. R., Boudreau J. W.. Seperating the Developmental and Evaluative Performance Appraisal Uses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2002, 16(3): 391-412.
  • 5McNerney D. J.. Improved Performance Appraisals: Process of Elimination. HRFocus, 1995, (7): 5.
  • 6Murphy K. R., Cleveland J. N.. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-based Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995: Sage Publications.
  • 7Levy P. E., Williams J. R.. The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: Review and Framework for the Future. Journal of management, 2004, 30(6): 881-905.
  • 8Cleveland J. N., Murphy K. R., Williams R. E.. Multiple Uses of Performance Appraisal: Prevalence and Correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(1): 130-135.
  • 9Meyer H. H., Kay E., French J. R. P., Jr. Split Roles in Performance Appraisal. Harvard Business Review, 1965, (43): 123-129.
  • 10Mckenna E., Beech N.. Human Resource Management. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997:116—127.

共引文献202

引证文献12

二级引证文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部