期刊文献+

大五人格测验在中国应用的信度概化分析 被引量:5

A Reliability Generalization of the Big-Five Factor Personality Tests in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 对过去20年(1994~2013年)间国内有关大五人格测验的研究文献进行信度概化分析。结果表明:(1)检索到的文献中约68.15%存在"信度引入"现象;(2)未加权估计中,A和O的均值最低,N和C的均值最高,国内所得结果均略低于国外(O除外),而后者的变异性略大(E除外);采用α系数效果量方法,在随机效应模型中,N的估计值最高,O和A的估计值最低;(3)回归分析显示,分数均值、量表来源和南北地域差异是N维度信度的预测变量;量表来源、文章专业类型、测验版本和测验记分对E维度信度具有预测作用;样本量、文章专业类型和量表来源是O维度信度的预测变量;量表来源、文章专业类型、项目数和样本类型对A维度信度具有预测作用;量表来源、项目数、文章专业类型和测验记分是C维度信度的预测变量。 In this paper,we attempted to analysis the reliability generalization on studies of the Big-Five factor personality tests during the last 20 years( 1994 ~ 2013) in China. The results showed that:( 1) Among all studies,68. 15% caused reliability induction phenomenon.( 2) In the unweighted estimating,the lowest reliability coefficient was found for the Agreeableness and Openness,whereas the highest was found for the Neuroticism and Conscientiousness. What’s more,the reliabilities from Chinese researchers were less than Western counterparts,except the Openness. And the latter had higher variance,except the Extraversion. With the meta-analysis of coefficient alpha,the coefficient alpha of Neuroticism was the highest,whereas Agreeableness and Openness were the lowest,in the random effects model.( 3) The result of multivariate regression analysis indicated that sample characteristics such as the mean of scores,regional differences between the south and the north,inventory origin had predictive functions on the reliability for Neuroticism; inventory origin,paper types,testing version,and testing pointing were the main predictor variable for the reliability for Extraversion; sample size,paper types,and inventory origin had predictive functions on the reliability for Openness; paper origin,paper types,the number of the items,and sample types had predictive functions on the reliability for Agreeableness; inventory origin,the number of the items,paper types,and testing pointing were the main predictor variable for the reliability for Conscientiousness.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期121-128,共8页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31500913) 贵州省科学技术基金项目(黔科合J字LKS[2013]54号) 贵州省教育厅自然科学研究项目(黔教合[2014]299号) 贵州师范大学2014博士科研启动项目
关键词 大五人格测验 信度概化 α系数 元分析 Big-Five factor personality tests reliability generalization alpha coefficient meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献51

  • 1Adelson, J. L., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the mathemat- ical attitudes of elementary students : The effects of a four-point or five- point likert-type scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(5), 796 -807.
  • 2Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics emics derived etics: the operation- alization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24 (6), 721 -735.
  • 3Botella, J. , Suero, M. , & Gambara, H. (2010). Psychometric infer- ences from a meta-analysis of reliability and internal consistency coeffi- cients. Psychological Methods, 15 (4), 386 - 397.
  • 4Burisch, M. (1984). You don't always get what you pay for: Measur- ing depression with short and simple versus long and sophisticated scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 18 ( 1 ) , 81 - 98.
  • 5Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Perugini, M. (1993). The big five questionnaire: a new questionnaire to assess thefive factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15 (3) , 281 -288.
  • 6Caruso, J. C. (2000). Reliability generalization of the NEO personality scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60 (2), 236 - 254.
  • 7Caruso, J. C. , & Edwards, S. (2001). Reliability generalization of the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 31 (2), 173 - 184.
  • 8Chang, L. (1994). A Psychometric evaluation of four-point and six- point likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18 ( 3 ) , 205 - 215.
  • 9Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). NEO-PI-Rprofessional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Inc.
  • 10CredO, M., Harms, P., Niehorster, S., & Gaye-Valentine, A. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology, 102 (4) , 874 - 888.

二级参考文献264

共引文献623

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部