期刊文献+

股东会决议效力的判断标准与判断原则 被引量:37

Judgment Criterions and Principles of the Effect of Shareholder Meeting Resolution
原文传递
导出
摘要 股东会决议是多个股东的抽象意思表示,是公司意志与决策的载体,如果股东会决议程序上或实质上的瑕疵将直接影响决议的效力。对决议效力瑕疵的救济,既是维护股东权益又是保障公司健康运营的需要。我国《公司法》虽然规定了股东会决议瑕疵诉讼制度,但对个别股东在股东会决议中的意思表示瑕疵,还须依据民法通则相关规定与原理对股东意思表示的效力进行认定,股东意思表示未生效将影响整个股东会决议的效力。此外,对决议效力的认定须在多项司法原则指引下进行个案裁量,平衡不同原则之间的冲突。 Shareholder meeting resolution is an abstract representation of shareholders, and the carrier of a company' s determinations and decisions. Resolutions with procedural or substantive defects can be declared invalid or be withdrawn by a court, which could protect the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders, and create a favorable legal environment for companiesj healthy operations. Article 22 of China~ "Company Law" regulates the litigation rules of defective shareholder meeting resolutions, but under the circumstances of defec- tive individual shareholder' s intentions, China' s "Civil Law" should also be considered to determine the effect of individual shareholder' s intentions, which will have influence on the effect of shareholder meeting resolutions. That' s to say, if an individual shareholder' s intention does not take effect, it might affect the va- lidity of the entire shareholder meeting resolution. In addition, the effect of the resolution should be identified with discretion under the guidance of a number of judicial principles in order to balance the conflicts between those principles.
作者 赵心泽
机构地区 北京大学法学院
出处 《政法论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期150-159,共10页 Tribune of Political Science and Law
关键词 股东会决议 效力瑕疵 判断标准 判断原则 个案裁量 Shareholder Meeting Resolution Validity Defects Judgment Criterions Judgment Principles Discretion
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1叶林.商行为的性质[J].清华法学,2008,2(4):40-54. 被引量:67
  • 2[美]乔·萨托利 冯克利 阎克文译.《民主新论》[M].东方出版社,1993年版.第340页.
  • 3何美欢.《公众公司及其股权证券》,北京大学出版社2000年版,第803页.
  • 4See Black' s Law Dictionary, West Publishing Co., 5th edition, 1979, p. 564.
  • 5Charlesworth and Mores, Company Law, 14th edition, Sweet & Maxwell Press, 1991, pp. 430-431.
  • 6Lebld v Inland Steel Co., 125 F 2d 369.
  • 7Robert W. Hamilton, The Law of Corporations, West Group, 5th edition, 2000, p. 444.
  • 8Paul L. Davies,Gower' s Principles of Modern Company Law, Sweet & Maxwell Lid, 1997, Chapter 26.
  • 9[法]博洛尔.《政治的罪恶》,改革出版社1999年版,第47-49页.
  • 10Merrit B.B. Fox and Michael A. Heller, Corporate Governance Lessons from Russian Enterprise Fiascoes, New York University Law Review, vol. 75(2000), p. 1735.

共引文献78

同被引文献346

二级引证文献168

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部