期刊文献+

椎间孔镜与小切口手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床效果比较 被引量:10

Clinical effect comparison of transforaminal endoscope and small incision surgery in treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨椎间孔镜和小切口手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果。方法 2013年1月~2014年2月,将96例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各48例。观察组行椎间孔镜手术,对照组行小切口手术,观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组治疗有效率明显高于对照组,手术时间、住院时间明显短于对照组,术中出血量明显少于对照组,手术切口大小明显小于对照组,VAS评分明显低于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论椎间孔镜手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者具有手术时间短、切口小、出血量少、疼痛轻等优点,值得临床推广。 Objective To discuss the effect of transforaminal endoscope and small incision surgery in treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Methods From January 2013 to February 2014,96 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation were randomly divided into observation group and control group,each group has 48 cases.Observation group was given transforaminal endoscopic surgery,while control group was given small incision surgery.The treatment effect of patients in both groups was observed respectively. Results The operation time and hospitalization time of observation group was significantly shorter than that in control group,the amount of bleeding during operation was significantly less than that in control group,the incision size was significantly smaller than that in control group,and the VAS score was significantly lower than that in control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Transforaminal endoscopic surgery has advantages of short operative time,small incision,little blood loss and slight pain in treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation,which is worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《中国当代医药》 2016年第1期116-118,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 椎间孔镜 小切口 腰椎间盘突出症 效果比较 Transforaminal endoscope Small incision Lumbar intervertebral disc herniation Effect comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献103

  • 1张西峰,王岩,肖嵩华,刘郑生,刘保卫,张永刚.经皮侧方入路内窥镜下椎间盘切除术的可行性及临床应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(9):659-662. 被引量:46
  • 2周跃,王健,初同伟,李长青,张正丰,王卫东,郑文杰.极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症的微创外科治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(4):241-247. 被引量:72
  • 3Pfirrmann CW,Metzdorf A,Zanetti M,et al.Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration[J].Spine,2001,26(17):1873-1878.
  • 4Fairbank JC,Pynsent PB.The oswestry disability index[J].Spine,2000,25(22):2940-2952.
  • 5Macnab I.Negative disc exploration.An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am.1971,53(5):891-903.
  • 6Alan Y,Lee SH,Park WM,et al.Posterolateral pereutancous endoscopie lumbar foraminotomy for L5/S1 foraminal or lateral exitzone stenosis:technical note[J].J Neurosurg,2003,99(3 Suppl):S320-323.
  • 7Lee SH,Kang BU,Ahn Y,et al.Operative failure of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy:a radiologic analysis of 55 cases[J].Spine,2006,31(10):E285-290.
  • 8Choi G,Lee SH,Lokhande P,et al.Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope[J].Spine,2008,33(15):E508-515.
  • 9Yeung AT,Yeung CA.Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery:foraminal approach[J].Surg Technol Int,2003,11:255-263.
  • 10Yeung AT,Tsou PM.Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation:surgical technique,outsome,and complications in 307 consecutive cases[J].Spine,2002,27(7):722-731.

共引文献260

同被引文献70

引证文献10

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部