期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症有效性和安全性的随机双盲阳性药物对照试验 被引量:5

Efficacy and Safety of Escitalopram in the Treatment of Depression: A Double-blind Randomized Active-drug Controlled Trial
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症有效性和安全性。方法将2013年1月至2015年1月我院诊断为抑郁症的患者100例随机分配2组,每组50例,定义为研究组和对照组,分别给予艾司西酞普兰和西酞普兰。对比研究组和对照组治疗前、治疗2、4周时HAMD分值、治疗前、治疗2、4周时抑郁症的疗效以及两组使用药物的安全性。结果研究组和对照组治疗前汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分结果比较无差异(P>0.05),而治疗4、8周时汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分结果比较有差异(P<0.05)。研究组和对照组治疗前、治疗2、4周时抑郁症的有效率分别为(38%、84%)、(12%、68%),结果比较有差异(P<0.05);研究组和对照组服用药物期间发生不良反应例数分别为5、17例,结果比较有差异(P<0.05)。结论本次研究认为艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症的疗效好于西酞普兰,使用安全性好。 Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of Escitalopram treating depression. Methods 100 cases of depression patients were randomly divided into study group and control group, 50 cases each. They respectively received Escitalopram and citalopram. Results The HAMD (Hamilton Depression Scale) scores of study group and control group before treatment showed no difference (P〉0.05), yet 4 weeks and 8 weeks after treatment, HAMD scores of two group had significant difference (P〈0.05). The effective treatment rate of 2 weeks after treatment and 4 weeks after treatment of two groups were respectively (38%, 84%), (12%, 68%). The occurrence number of adverse reactions of two groups were 5 cases and 17 cases (P 〈0.05). Conclusion The study suggests that the efficacy of escitalopram in the treatment of depression is better than citalopram, and it has good security.
作者 王健
出处 《中国医药指南》 2016年第2期16-17,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 艾司西酞普兰 抑郁症 有效性 安全性 Escitalopram Depression Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献12

  • 1唐伟,黄文武.西酞普兰与阿米替林治疗抑郁症的对照研究[J].上海精神医学,2005,17(2):87-88. 被引量:12
  • 2司天梅,舒良.关于新抗抑郁药艾司西酞普兰[J].临床精神医学杂志,2007,17(1):68-69. 被引量:124
  • 3赵宝岐.艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症30例临床观察[J].中国民康医学,2007,19(11):473-473. 被引量:5
  • 4Rothermundt M, Arolt V, Wiesmann M, et al. S100B is increased in melancholic but not in nonmelancholic major depression. J Affect Disord, 2001,66: 89 ~ 93.
  • 5Schroeter ML, Abdul-Khaliq H, Diefenbacher A, et al. S100B is increased in mood disorders and may be reduced by antidepressive treatment. Neuroreport, 2002,13 (13): 1675 ~ 1678.
  • 6Muldon C. The safety and tolerability of citalopram [ J]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 1996,11 ( Suppl 1 ) : 35.
  • 7Colonna L, Andersen HF, Reines EH. A randomized, double- blind, 24- week study of escitalopram( 10 mg·d^-1 ) citalopram (20 mg·d^-1 ) in primary care patientswithmajordepressive disorder [ J]. Curr Med ResOpin, 2005, 21(10): 1 659.
  • 8Moore N, Verdoux H, Fantino B. Prospective, multicentre, randomized, double - blind study of the efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram in outpatient treatment of major depressive disorder [ J ]. Int Clin Psychopharmcol, 2005, 20 (3) : 131.
  • 9Goman JM, Korotzer A, Su G. Efficacy comparison of escitalopramand citalopram in the theatment of major depressive disorder: pooled analysis of placebo- controlled trials[J]. CNS Spectr,2002, 7(Suppl 1): 40.
  • 10刘秀珍.S-100蛋白与中枢神经系统损伤[J].国外医学(临床生物化学与检验学分册),2000,21(1):15-17. 被引量:10

共引文献16

同被引文献42

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部