期刊文献+

基于层次移动IPv6的切换方案改进

HANDOVER SCHEME IMPROVEMENT BASED ON HIERARCHICAL MOBILE IPv6
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在HMIPv6中,当发生区域间切换时,移动节点MN需要向家乡代理和通信对端注册,这导致了较长的时延和较多的开销。提出一种改进的方案:MN发生区域间切换时,先利用之前所注册的实体移动锚点MAP作为新进入的区域MAP的上层代理来减少切换时延;然后根据自己的移动特性计算决定本次切换是否进行家乡注册,通过进一步减少家乡注册的次数来降低开销。数值分析和仿真结果表明该方法的有效性,对于不同的移动环境,平均开销相对更优,体现了较好的自适应性。 In HMIPv6, mobile node (MN) needs to perform registrations for home agent and communication pair when the handover occurs between two domains, this results in longer delay and higher overhead. This paper proposes an improved handover scheme, in which the MN utilises the MAP previously registered as the upper agent of the newly entered regional MAP to reduce handover delay when the handover occurs between two MAP domains, and then calculates and decides whether to perform home registration in handover of this time according to its own mobile characteristic. It reduces the overhead by further reducing the number of times of home registration. Numerical analysis and simulation result show that the proposed method is effective. For different mobile environments, the improved scheme reveals better adaptability with relatively superior average overhead.
出处 《计算机应用与软件》 CSCD 2016年第1期94-97,111,共5页 Computer Applications and Software
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61363050)
关键词 切换方案 位置管理开销 数据传输开销 自适应性 Handover scheme Location management cost Data delivery cost Adaptabihty
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Montavont N,Noel T.Handover Management for Mobile Nodes in IPv6Network[J].IEEE Communications Magazine,August,2002,40(8):38-43.
  • 2Johnson D,Perkins C,Arkko J.Mobility Support in IPv6[S].IETF RFC 3775,June 2003.
  • 3Soliman H,Castelluccia C,Malki K E,et al.Hierarchical Mobile IPv6Mobility Management(HMIPv6)[S].IETF RFC 4140,Aug 2005.
  • 4Campbell A,Gomez J,Kim S,et al.Design,Implementation and Evaluation of Cellular IP[J].IEEE Personal Comm.Magazine,2000,7(4):42-49.
  • 5Ramjee R,Porta T,Thuel S,et al.HAWAII:A Domain-Based Approach for Supporting Mobility In Wide-Area Wireless Networks[J].IEEE/ACM Trans.Networking,2002,6(2):396-410.
  • 6Shengling Wang,Yong Cui,Das S K,et al.Mobility in IPv6:Whether and How to Hierarchize the Network[J].IEEE Transaction on parallel and distributed systems,2011,22(10):1722-1729.
  • 7Pack S,Kwon T,Choi Y.A performance comparison of mobility anchor point selection schemes in hierarchical mobile ipv6 networks[J].Computer Network,2007,51(6):1630-1642.
  • 8Sangheon Pack,Taekyoung Kwon,Yanghee Choi,et al.An Adaptive Network Mobility Support Protocol in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks[J].IEEE Transaction on vehicular technology,2009,58(7):3627-3639.
  • 9Wei Kuang Lai,Jung Chia Chiu.Improving Handoff Performance in Wireless Overlay Networks by Switching Between Two-Layer IPv6 and One-Layer IPv6 Addressing[J].IEEE journal on selected areas in communications,2005,23(11):2129-2137.
  • 10Condeixa T,Sargento S.Centralized,Distributed or Replicated IP Mobility?[J].IEEE Communications Letters,2014,18(2):376-379.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Johnson D,Perkins C,Arkko J.RFC3775,Mobility Support in IPv6[S],2004.
  • 2Devarapalli V,Wakikawa R,Petrescu A,et al.RFC3963,Network Mobility(NEMO)Basic Support Protocol[S],2005.
  • 3Ng C,Thubert P,Watari M,et al.RFC4888,Network Mobility Route Optimization Problem Statement[S],2007.
  • 4Okajima I,Umeda N,Yamao Y.Architecure and Mobile IPv6Exten-sions Supporting Mobile Networks in Mobile Communications[C]//IEEE VTC2001,New Jersey USA:IEEE,2001,4:2533-2537.
  • 5Thubert P,Molteni M.IPv6Reverse Routing Header and Iits Applica-tion to Mobile Networks[S].IETF draft-thubert-nemo-reverse-rou-ting-header-05,2004.
  • 6Calos J,Marcelo B,Maria C.MIPv6Optimization for NEMO[C]//Proc.Of IEE.Int’l Conf.on Applications and Services in Wireless Networks.Boston,Massachusetts,USA:2004.
  • 7Thubert,P,N Montavont.Nested Nemo Tree Discovery.Draft-thu-bert-tree-discovery-00(work in progress),May2004.
  • 8Lo Shou-chih,Lee Guangling,Chen Wen-Tsuen,et al.Architecture for Mobility and QoS Support in All-IP Wireless Networks[C]//IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.USA:2004:691-700.
  • 9Johnson D, Perkns C, Arkko J. RFC 3775 Mobility support in IPv6 [ S]. IETF, 2004.
  • 10Soliman H, Catcluccia C, Maiki K, et al. RFC 4140 Hierarchical Mo- bile IPv6 mobility management(HMIPv6) [ S]. 2005.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部