3[1]Richard E. Mayer. Intelligence and education[A]. R .J. Sternberg. Hand Book Of Intelligence[C]. Cambridge Press,2000.
4[3]Mettetal, Gwendolyn, Jordan, Cheryl, Harper, Sheryll. Attitudes toward a multiple intelligence curriculum[J]. The Journal of Educational Research, 1998,9/10, V.91(No.2) :115 - 122.
5[4]Griffin, S., Case, R., & Capodilupo, A. The importance of the central conceptual structures in the elementary mathematics curriculum[A]. A. Mckeough, J. Lupart, &A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning [C]. Cambridge, MA:Brookline, 1995.
6[5]Weiko Tomic. Brief research report training in inductive reasoning and problem solving [J]. Contemporary Educational Psychology,1995(20) :483 - 490.
7[6]Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. IMPROVE:A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms[J].Amercian Educational Reasearch Journal, 1997(34) :365 - 394.
8[7]Zemira R. Mevarech. Effects of metacognitive training embedded in cooperative settings on mathematical problem solving[J]. The Journal of Educational Research. 1999(92).
9[8]Yair Neuman, Liat Leibowitse, Baruch, Schwarz. Patterns of verbal mediation during problem solving: A sequential analysis of self-explanation[J]. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2000, 68(3):197-213.
10[9]Dale S. Rose, Michaela Parks, Karl Androes, Susand, Mcmahoh.Imagery-based learning: Improving elementary students reading comprehension with drama techniques [ J ]. The Journal of Educational Research.2000,9/10, Vol. 94 (No. 1).
