期刊文献+

利用方差分量估计的地震同震滑动分布反演 被引量:15

Coseismic Slip Distribution Inversion Method Based on the Variance Component Estimation
原文传递
导出
摘要 提出了基于方差分量估计的地震同震滑动分布反演方法,该方法不仅可以确定不同数据集的相对权重,而且还能得到平滑因子的值,突破了方差分量估计方法仅用于各类数据定权的实际应用范围。模拟算例验证了此方法的有效性,从解的概率后验密度分布分析来看,方差分量估计方法得到的结果是线性和非线性混合方法反演结果的一个解。用方差分量估计方法反演了Bam地震同震滑动分布,并与线性非线性混合方法反演的结果进行了对比分析。两种方法得到的Bam地震断层滑动分布之间的空间互相关系数为0.999 9,地震同震的最大滑动量相同,都为3.04m;其深度仅有微小区别,前者为4.50km,后者为4.47km;平均滑动量前者为0.714m,后者为0.718m。但前者反演计算用时227s,后者却达到1.5×106 s,约17d,前者仅为后者的1/6 608。结果表明,本文方法相对于线性和非线性混合方法具有计算简单、计算量小和计算效率高的优点。 We propose a coseismic slip distribution inversion method based on variance component estimation(VCE),this method not only determines the weight of different data sets but also can get the smoothing factor value.To illustrate and validate this inversion method,we conducted inversions on synthetic data sets.Based on the Bayesian framework and according to the posterior probability density distribution of the unknown parameters,the proposed solution is comparted to one of the linearnon-linear inversion solutions to further demonstrate the use of the proposed method.We conduct inversions on the 2003 Bam earthquake with the proposed method and linear-non-linear inversion method,the spatial cross correlation of the resulting slip distribution was about 0.999,the depth of the max slip of the both were 3.04 mand the depth had little difference,the former was 4.50 km,the latter was 4.47 km.The mean slip in the former was 0.714 m,the latter was 0.718 m.But the inversion time of the former was 227 s,and only about 1/8 000 of the later(reaching 1.5×106 s,about 17d).These results show that the VCE method is effective and faster than the linear-non-linear inversion method.
出处 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第1期37-44,共8页 Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(41431069) 国家自然科学基金(41274030) 地震行业科研专项基金(201308009) 国家973计划(2013CB733303)~~
关键词 方差分量估计 线性非线性反演方法 同震滑动分布 反演 同震形变 variance component estimation linear-non-linear inversion method coseismic slip distribution inversion coseismic displacement
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1许才军.大地测量联合反演理论和方法研究进展[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2001,26(6):555-561. 被引量:15
  • 2许才军,陈庭,张丽琴,等.大地测量地球物理联合反演理论及应用[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2015.
  • 3张朝玉,许才军.具有自适应权比的大地测量联合反演序贯算法及其应用[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2012,37(10):1140-1144. 被引量:4
  • 4Fukuda J, Johnson K M. A fully Bayesian Inversion for Spatial Distribution of Fault Slip with Objective Smoothing[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Socie- ty of America, 2008, 98(3): 1 128-1 146.
  • 5Fukuda J, Johnson K M. Mixed Linearnonlinear In- version of Crustal Deformation Data: Bayesian In- ference of Model, Weighting and Regularization Pa- rameters [J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2010, 181(3): 1 441-1 458.
  • 6Funning G J, Parsons B, Wright T J, et al. Surface Displacements and Source Parameters of the 2003 Bam (Iran) Earthquake from Envisat advanced Syn- thetic Aperture Radar Imagery[J]. Journal of Geo- physical Research, 2005, l10(B9) : 406-416.
  • 7Jensson S, Zebker H, Segall P, et al. Fault Slip Distribution of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, Cal- ifornia, Earthquake, Estimated from Satellite Radar and GPS Measurements[J]. Bull Seismol Soc Am, 2002, 92(4):1 377-1 389.
  • 8Koch K R, Kusche J. Regularization of Geopoten- tial Determination from Satellite Data by Variance Components[J]. Journal of Geodesy, 2002, 76 (5) :259-268.
  • 9Okada Y. Surface Deformation Due to Shear and Tensile Faults in a Half Space[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1985, 75 (4) : 1 135-1 154.
  • 10Graves R W, Wald D J. Resolution Analysis of Fi- nite Fault Source Inversion Using Oneand Three Di- mensional Green's Functions 1. Strong Motions [J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001, 6 (B5) : 8 745-8 766.

二级参考文献24

共引文献16

同被引文献106

引证文献15

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部